Is Canelo a better fighter then Chris Eubank Snr?

And that was my point. Mayweather beat the brakes off of Canelo and Mayweather was the man in that division.
GGG beat Canelo the first time at middleweight and everybody knows that was a horrible decision.
So what weight class did Canelo dominate again.

 

Benn didn`t look good v Eubank, he fought far better in the rematch both fighters got caught a lot in their first clash, Canelo is better than anybody Sr beat.

 

I think Saunders would have beaten Watson and done well v McCallum.

 

I like Saunders but a prime MCcallum would have gotten him. He never faced anyone close to a MCcallum.
I do believe his style would give Mike a problem but I don't think Saunders would be more difficult then say a Graham or Kalambay.

 

Eubank has become somewhat underrated to me but Canelo is still better both head to head and on resume and I don't see where there is an argument for Eubank

 

Nah

 

He`s dominating super-middle now, Eubank never did.

 

Where were the challengers rated by the ring mag at that time? Ray Close should have been giving a decision over Eubank.

 

No his footspeed, McCallum had trouble with Graham and Kalambay due to their movement, Graham was a southpaw too, Watson didn`t have Saunders movement.

 

Title fights doesn't mean better fighters. Especially when they were mainly defenses of his own lightly regarded wbo title from that period

 

Graham`s head was too upright when he punched, he benefitted from a long reach and staying out of range.