Is Chambers now the IBF mandatory?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by diehard, Feb 12, 2011.


  1. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    It was a good fight and a very very good round 10!
     
  2. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    i hope the **** not...i like eddie, hes a cool likeable guy
    but

    hes a little man in a big mans world

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  3. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,567
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    I don't see why a Chamber's vs Peter eliminator would be a bad thing. It would be an excellent styles matchup, as it was the first time around, and a rematch vs Wlad for either would make for a good fight. We saw Ali/ Frazier x3, Holy vs Bowe 3 and Lewis Holy x2. Tyson Holy x 2. Wtf, If Potvetkin, Boystov, Dimitrenko, Haye don't want to get their asses handed to them, then why should Peter and Chambers not be afforded the opportunity for a 2nd or 3rd asskicking.

    Chambers has the ability to get a points win over Wlad if he can get inside, and Peter has that chance of landing the shot he did against Jeremy Williams vs Wlad.

    At least guys like Adamek, Peter, Thompson, and Chambers have the balls of a fighter. Boystov has hand problems so I won't belittle him, but as for Potvetkin and Haye, and Dimitranko, these guys have had the chance to win the ring championship and earn the title of baddest man on the planet, and have run with their tails between their legs yelping all the way.
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,376
    Nov 30, 2006
    Welcome to the party. :yep
     
  5. Slacker

    Slacker Big & Slow Full Member

    6,774
    3
    Sep 19, 2009
    I think Chambers year should look like this:

    Next fight - Tony Thompson - He's been in with Wlad, is a tall fighter, tough opposition.

    Second fight Peter/Harris winner - mandatory

    Third fight Robert Helenius - Poor mans version of Wlad. Both have the plodding, European style and fight tall.

    Next Spring could fight Wlad.

     
  6. 11player

    11player Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,178
    393
    Sep 19, 2007
    IBF can't be serious about doing a Chambers vs Peter mandatory eliminator. Both guys just came from getting KOed by Wlad last year.

    At least they should include other names in the mix to make it legit.
    Chambers vs Rossy already happened, now they should make:
    Peter vs M. Grant
    Arreola vs Banks
    Tony Thompson vs Boswell.

    Winners keep meeting up till one is left.
     
  7. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,045
    Jan 29, 2005
    Chambers vs Peter would be interesting, but Wlad vs either one would be pointless.

    But what can you do, with four sanctioning bodies, all trying not to step on each other's toes, by not take each other's mandatory participants?

    There are only so many heavyweights to go around to keep the titleholders in mandaory defenses. You eventually gotta start rahashing some previously beaten opponents.

    But to me, the line is drawn if Peter gets a shot at Wlad, again. That would be absolutely rediculous and uninteresting.
     
  8. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,098
    Jul 19, 2004
    Some boxers have nine lives!
     
  9. Slacker

    Slacker Big & Slow Full Member

    6,774
    3
    Sep 19, 2009
    Saw on Eddie's Facebook today that he wants a rematch with Povetkin.

    "I'm tired of being looked over I want Povetkin, Adamek or Haye then the Klitschkos! I want Povetkin bad! Him and Teddy will never fight me if they don't have to."