Is Chris Eubank a top 100 ATG?

Hell no.

 

A no for me

 

ooooo, that's tough. i'm gonna say WAY at the bottom but yeah, i gotta give it to him

 

All those controversial decisions no.Benn won that second fight.

 

not quite, great fighter though

 

C'mon man, that's just ridiculous. Think of it this way - modern era of boxing has been going for 115 years now, which averages out to about 9 fighters per decade. Forgetting the fact that the numbers are backloaded, do you think Eubank was one of the best 9 boxers of his era? Probably not even close.

He was good, and possibly underrated if anything, but he's not close to being top 100 all time.

 

Very good fighter, not a top 100 atg by any stretch. He would have beaten every 160-168 pounder today though.

 

Mike Tyson #100

is he better?

 

Great fighter, amazing fighter to be honest. But one of the best 100 fighters ever to get in a boxing ring? Nah, sorry.

 

but that's from bert sugar's list ya? the guys a dink. mike tyson is WELL above #100.

 

Mike tyson's prime is under rated.

 

exactly. tyson is top 50, eubank isn't close. but i think eubank is 95-100 along with the likes of (off the top of my head) jimmy carter, bennie brisco, valdez

 

Bro dont mean to have a go at you but theres no way that Tyson is top 50 of all time,if it was just based on talent i could see that but he simply doesnt have the resume to be ranked that high.