Is Chris Eubank the lowest ranked divisional ATG ever?

And please don't make anymore of those ridiculous lists! They are absolutely absurd.

 

Don't forget BJS.

 

Anyone who has read your posts realises. You're laughable.

 

Why not?
He did beat Jr.

 

If it was a joke belt, no fault of Eubank! His manager picked it, and national TV. His bank manager wasn't complaining. Shoot them. But the four governing bodies had the same fighters in the rankings.

You continue to flabberghast! Any ranking is purely subjective - buy a dictionary and raise your IQ.

So you rate Mauro Galvano, Victor Cordoba and Darrin Van Horn ahead of Eubank?

 

I see your point. I think we have to take into consideration that he shared the division with peaking versions of Toney and Jones, though.

 

BBBoC would've of even approved him as an opponent for Eubank back then.

 

And who's Mitchell? That plodder from Alabama who fought Calzaghe in the mid-00s!?

 

There's nothing objective about 'ranking' one champion ahead of another, unless they fight and one wins.

 

We have long established that this guy cannot comprehend the concept of 'H2H' and real-life in-ring fighting ability with your eyes and brain. It is boring as he continues to troll the boards with letter and word game crap.

 

I remember in another thread in general him suggesting that an old Mayweather would easily beat a young ROY JONES because he was objectively 'P4P 1' and had an objectively 'ATG' resume and more belts in his cabinet at that point