Is Danny Garcia still relevant to the Welterweight division?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by 120-108, Nov 8, 2018.


  1. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,264
    15,085
    Dec 6, 2008
  2. 120-108

    120-108 New Member banned Full Member

    68
    31
    Nov 8, 2018
    The overrating of Danny Garcia continues.. lol
    I just don't see how he's a threat to them, at all.
    They are better than him in every department.
     
  3. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    A lot of people have overrated Danny. I don't, as I'm well aware of his limitations. But you think there's only TWO good welterweights. Most people will disagree with you on that, and rightfully so.
     
  4. chatty

    chatty Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,413
    1,067
    Aug 18, 2009
    He can be in some good fights at welterweight for the next few years. He'll get shots again most likely fight Spence and maybes rematch one or both of Thur an and Garcia. Don't see him. Fighting Crawford due to promotion wars, could fight the Brook/Khan and or Broner/Pacquiao winners, plenty big fights for him.
     
  5. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,148
    Dec 23, 2013
    Stopped reading here. No need for me to subject myself to any more stupidity.
     
  6. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    danny will never again hold any piece of the ww hardware.
    pac-broner winner would be the best fight for him, before one of them loses again. a healthy benavidez ko's him, but who knows how permanent the damage to his leg is. maybe horn, but thats conceding the level your on. i would say mikey, but mikey got spence problems himself. bud boxes his ears off. algieri, assuming hes back in the picture, would be a good fight for him. it would give him the kind of movement hes gonna get from the bosses, against a recognizable guy he could realistically ko, without much danger of him getting stopped himself.
     
  7. 120-108

    120-108 New Member banned Full Member

    68
    31
    Nov 8, 2018
    Troll!!! ahahahahaaha

    Maybe you are getting him mixed up with Mikey LOL

    Danny Garcia is AVERAGE in EVERY department.

    No top A level boxer would struggle and need a gifts against Ashley Theophane! and Herrera and Peterson!
    And lose to Shawn Porter.
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2018
  8. 120-108

    120-108 New Member banned Full Member

    68
    31
    Nov 8, 2018
    He's a massively overrated., very ordinary, slow, predictable, easy to hit , very one dimensional., mediocre, extremely beatable fighter with poor footwork, poor selection of punches who got his ass kicked by mediocre/poor fighters such as Herrera, Peterson, and Theophane!

    Go watch Herrera giving him him a boxing lesson! and Peterson winning 7- 8 rounds rounds against him..
    anyone who disagrees that he's average as hell YDKSAB!
     
  9. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,591
    17,669
    Apr 3, 2012
    I'm not sure he deserved a loss to Porter.
     
  10. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    BS!!! Gracia is not a C Level fighter. You are kidding me, aren't you?
     
  11. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    WTF?!?! Danny Garcia a C level fighter? And Peterson a weak fighter? Kid, are you plugged in? I'm not a fan of him personally or as a boxer but respect him as a boxer and the kid does have skills, just lacks in the athleticism department at the top level. And those two losses to Porter and Thurman were close dust ups. No shame in those losses.
     
    Accurate and Nopporn like this.
  12. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    What this TS said is completely nonsense. Gracia used to be the best at 140 even though he has not been the best at 147. To say that Gracia is a basic C Level fighter imply that YDKSAB.
     
    pistal47 likes this.
  13. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    Straight up bro. This kids out of his tree.
     
  14. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,318
    11,363
    Jan 6, 2007

    He's an A level fighter by most definitions.

    He would take Crawford the distance, maybe Spence too.
    He would be the decisive underdog in both instances, but he would make a fight of it.

    Anybody in the top 5 or 6 in his division is NOT a C level.
     
  15. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    If I was to rank the WW division right now h2h it would be:

    Crawford
    Spence
    Pac
    Thurman
    Porter
    Mikey Garcia
    Amir Khan
    Danny Garcia
    Broner
    Vargas

    Can’t tell where brooks is at this point. If he’s shot, he loses to porter in a rematch, if he’s as good as he was before, he’s just below Spence. Pac is also debateable, IMO he beats Thurman but loses to porter, styles, he won’t be able to keep up with porters pace but he could dance circles around Thurman awkward ass.

    I put khan over Garcia just because I would put my money on him in a rematch. I’d expect him to stay outside and just outbox him for 12 rounds. Not start throwing uppercut inside to get a counter left hook.
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2018