You seem more bothered about english and grammar than boxing. You have not heard about lower weight boxers moving up in weight and getting a decent cut. You don't seem to know about haye being the crusierweight champion and therefore not just some boxer from a lower weight class.
Now you have also mischarecterized my original post, are you going for a hat trick? What I said is that Wladimir always offers his opponents a decent cut, and that Haye has not earned a fight with him; and thus, does not have the leverage to make anykind of demands.
The problem is Haye isn't the draw that the fighters you're referring to are. Wladimir is, by far, a bigger draw than Haye, and no way does Haye deserve all of the UK television rights.
you said haye had nothing to offer and had 0 cred at heavyweight, both of these quotes suggest you don't know much about boxing. Also when i mentioned other fighters who have come up in weight as champions getting a good cut you start on about english and grammar.
Are you suggesting that Haye does have credibility at heavyweight? And, it's not about getting a 'good cut' (please pay attention), it's about making unreasonable demands.
He obviously does have some cred as he has beaten two heavyweights within the top 50 which puts him above 0 by a way. He is ranked by a number of the bodies and ring/boxrec at heavyweight also suggesting he has some cred there as well. In terms of the demands and the cut you don't know anymore than anyone else about whats been offered so how can you say nay demands are unreasonable. In terms of hayes standing even people big in the wlad camp such as chef have said that haye is more than just a standard challenge to wlad and in turn deserves a 'good cut'.
Seeing as you're such a stickler for grammar I feel duty bound to point out that in English it's "mischaracterised" not "mischarecterized" You may now continue :good