We could do with Usyk getting on with his stab at heavyweights. He's much bigger than someone like Dempsey, of course, but it's still interesting to see how a natural 200lb man is going to do against a the best in a heavyweight division dominated by big, big men now.
It is just about possible theoretically. It would be easier to argue his case than Marciano's in this respect. However, making the claim would require extraordinary evidence, and the evidence that we have does not meet that watermark.
To be fair, nobody does really. There's no way to produce data that will "prove" one or the other of these is the number one head to head, it's speculation on anybody's part at heavyweight more than any other division probably. The main names would be Muhammad Ali, who never fought really good super-heavies, Lennox Lewis, who was twice destroyed by punchers of only good skill, and one or two others, each as flawed as the other. You can present devastating arguments against any claimant, really.
6’1”. 193lbs. 73 inch reach. Head to head he is at an extreme physical disadvantage over say Lennox Lewis: 6’5” 247lbs. 84 inch reach. I love Dempsey but sometimes, just sometimes skill, rage, heart, determination and will combined with courage and guts only gets you beaten worse. No. Just No.
I can think of at least 10 Heavyweight champs that ko him early. So no he isn't a great head to head match-up. Not even close.
Probably more so than any other heavyweight to be considered... Greatest peak fighter ever Its unfortunate the lack of boxing knowledge and history here except for rare exceptions
I think that you could make a very strong case for Joe Louis, or Muhammad Ali, based upon their real world accomplishments. Their depth of success against elite opponents, of every kind imaginable, proves that they were exceptionally difficult men to beat. They just kept beating the odds, where other all time greats didn't. This does not mean that they would have necessarily beaten Jack Dempsey, or Lennox Lewis, but they probably would have got better results vs the same dozen opponents. I would make that claim!
I would suggest that they could very easily lose to Vitali, Wladimir, Lennox Lewis and even someone like Tyson Fury (and if not he, the next one...or the next one...). Those boys just don't have experience against guys who are 6'5 250lbs. Fighters who were both of those things were so rare in their respective eras and there were basically zero world class fighters. If we take someone like Ali and line him up with someone like Wlad, he's listed as three inches shorter, three inches shorter in reach (a bad combo) and outweighte prime for prime by more than 30lbs. Those are all dramatic weight-class type advantages. These guys could just walk cruiserweight sized fighters down, I think. That means your ATG h2h probably comes from this bigger group but Lewis can be KO'd, Vitali never proved himself against truly elite (elite elite) opposition and Wladimir had chin and stamina problems that made aspects of generalship so key. In the end, nothing you say is silly, but it's all very opposable.
Let's say that they could. Would they have lost to the worst men that beat those men? Would they have done better against the available opposition in the same era? Those kind of matches are a bit easier to call IMHO.
No, I don’t think so, now I tend to rate a prime Dempsey alittle higher than most, but I highly doubt he’d be no 1 H2H, but styles make fights man, I’d give Dempsey a better shot at the Klit brothers than Louis or Ali because Dempsey was the Giant Slayer, but Louis and Ali would probably ruin Dempsey in the ring... so who knows.. sorry for being absolutely no help at all lol