Is Enzo the worst CW title holder in history? Shocking defense and poor punch resistance. Utterly outclassed by David Haye. I can't think of a CW champion he would beat. Frankly he couldn't beat a one legged man at an arse kicking contest.
People judge him on his fights agaisnt Scott, Hobson and Haye. they shouldn't underrate him just because he got smashed to bits as soon as he fougth anyone above domestic class
yea hes pretty **** tbh.. never likes his style, he looks good against bums,, if he knew how to fight he would have lasted longer with haye
Some of the early Cruiserweight champions were terrible, Macca wasn't that bad a champion. A paper champion yes but an okay champion none the less. He's better than Firat Arslan who holds a belt now and there is a good chance Enzo will beat Banks to regain his title.
Enzo has yet to prove himself a top 10 cruiserweight. He has not fought too many opponents of European calibur but he does have abit of talent. I think we would be better judging him from now on and not on the career he has had so far.
The point of the thread was baiting Flint to reply due a challenge put foward in another thread. He lasted 20 minutes. Frankly I dont think Enzo is that bad, but I know he aint as good as Haye.
I guess you never saw S T Gordon or Ricky Parkey or Tyrone Booze fight then? And for the record there has been a one legged Cruiserweight contender (Craig Bodzianowski) and Enzo wins comfortable.