Is Ernesto Marcel a better fighter than Pac, MAB, JMM and EM?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sweet_scientist, Mar 9, 2009.


  1. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Well, is he?

    I think the answer is yes.

    At least better as a featherweight, in any case.
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    H2H he'd give them all sorts of trouble.....think his win over Arguello was a wee bit dodgy, but I wouldn't rank him above any of these in my ATG list.
     
  3. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    What was your score for the Arguello fight Flea? I had Ernesto taking it 146-141. A few rounds in there could have gone the other way, but I'd hardly call the decision 'a bit dodgy' myself. Thought Ernesto well and truly earned it.

    It might be hard to rank Marcel above Pac, EM, JMM and MAB because of their exploits at other weight classes, but at 126, I think I'd take Marcel to beat them all.
     
  4. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,037
    18,322
    Jul 29, 2004
    I wouldnt hesitate to pic Marcel over a featherweight Pac...I havent seen enough of him to say he beats the others at their best at feather but I reckon is exactly the kind of fighters that would trouble Morales and be a stylistic problem for the skillset of JMM..He is certainly could be considered on par with them taking into account the level of ability he showed in his own era..He has a couple of very good names on his resume at the weight, especially if you count the Shibata fight in his favour. Which I have never seen but Ive never heard a report stating he didnt take that fight.
     
  5. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    The Shibata fight was an out and out hold up. I had Marcel taking it by 4 points and that's not counting some of the one sided rounds in the last third of the fight that could have been counted 10-8's in Marcel's favour.

    Whilst we're talking Marcel, disregard the MD decision against Antonio Gomez, Marcel all but shut him out. Had Marcel winning that fight by 10 points. That was quite simply one of the best boxing masterclasses I have ever seen. A performance that would make anyone think long and hard before picking the likes of JMM or Morales to defeat him.

    Those that have only seen the Arguello and Duran fights are doing themselves a disservice. My esteem for him has increased greatly since seeing some of his more prime (weight and level) performances.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  6. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,037
    18,322
    Jul 29, 2004
    Ill have to track a copy down..is the rematch just as good?

    I have seen a few Gomez fights and he is no mug ..with a fair few very solid wins himself including Cervantes...He is the man who retired Saijo interestingly sweet.

    Correct me if Im wrong..I probably am..but I recall a bit of a Tapia-esque kind of ability in the fights I have seen of Marcel, which isnt much outside of highlights and its been probably over a year since Ive seen him.
     
  7. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    I think I had it slightly closer....probably due to my bias for Alexis though :good
     
  8. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    I haven't seen it mate, but I think whatever was left of his prime got beaten out of him in the first Marcel fight. That was a horrible beatdown.

    The man is skilled and tough as nails, no doubt, but after seeing Marcel escape with a MD after the massacre that was their first fight, I'll take the decisions Gomez got in his home town against DeJesus and Cervantes with a grain of salt.

    Hmm, well he does a lot of that in and out punching and getting out of range whilst having his hands down stuff, like Tapia did, but prime Marcel is more a mixture between Ismael Laguna and Eusebio Pedroza for mine.

    **** those Panamanians and their stamina.... scary stuff.
     
  9. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    So long as you have it close mate there's not much chance of bias :good
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    I'll have to dig my old card out....it may have been similar to yours Sweet Scientist, but I never score even rounds so god knows actually, I definitely had Marcel winning, but I find it hard not to marvel at everything Arguello does and therefore it may appear that he has done more in a round! I sometimes have to remind myself I'm watchin two fighters when I watch an Arguello fight :lol:
     
  11. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    83
    Jul 9, 2008
    Unfortunately, that's where I stand right now. But I'm still very impressed having seen that. I think Marcel would just be too slick for PAC and EM. Pac has refined his game since moving up but let's keep in mind that his opponents have lacked good quickness. I think he'd outhustle JMM. If Barrera could pick his spots and get the fight inside I'd maybe give him a shot against Marcel.
     
  12. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    83
    Jul 9, 2008
    p.s. I think I had Marcel by 3 points over Arguello. I think with that experience that Arguello could have taken a rematch, but nonetheless, great performance by Marcel. The stoppage against Duran was ludicrous. I've seen that same tippy toe dandy referee stop another fight prematurely like that but can't quite place the fight right now.
     
  13. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    Yes, imo.

    Marcel was a tremendous fighter.He'd have a chance against almost any featherweight and i'd make him no less than even money with all that have came after him.Id di think the Arguello fight could have gone either way however.marcel scored a lot of nice lead rights but Arguello came on like a freight train and soundly outworked him over the second half.

    The guy he won the title from, Gomez was a helluva fighter as well, more talented than JMM, MAB etc as well imo.Another guy who's dedication didn't match his skills.he had already started to lose non-title fights and looked sluggish as hell against Marcel; compared to the saijo fight.Some of that oculd be attributed to not liking to lead perhaps, and marcel was just better anyway.still i thought he did himself a disservice in that fight.

    that aside, i agree with sweet that it was one of the great performances , at least comparable to something like Pac vs Mab.
     
  14. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004

    I could see Gomez beating Dejesus due to the styles involved and Esteban not being a physical fighter at all, but it is massively difficult to imagine a much smaller natural featherweight getting the better of Cervantes, who must have looked absolutely huge next to him.
     
  15. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Perhaps, but all the same I'd like to hear reports on how the fights played out.

    That one judge had Marcel-Gomez even and another had it for Marcel by a mere 4 points, I think I reserve a right to be sceptical. Likewise I'll reserve judgement on the outcome of the first Miguel Canto-Betulio Gonzalez fight. After seeing Canto school him in the rematch, it's a little hard to envision Betulio getting the win there. Not discounting it totally, but just reserving judgement till I learn some more about it.