Is everyone who said Morales was shot in 2nd Pac fight now going to condemn JMM??????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Jan 2, 2011.


  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    :|:|:|:| Shut up fanboy, at the time no one said Morales was shot, no one, just because you've only been following Pacquaio 10mins doesn't change that and I probably did say Morales was shot to throw sand in your vagina :yep

    And he never asked for 50-50 fanboy, he asked for aprox 70-30 or 80-20 based on the figures, you've been called on your ******ed fanboy maths before as an excuse for ducking Marquez to take on Mosley because he'll take slightly less money - a fight you yourself have condemned

    Anyway are you saying Morales was shot in Pac 2&3 now? Get your fanboy story straight
     
  2. rjamesd1

    rjamesd1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,884
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Actually, had it not been because of that HEADBUTT that PAC sustained in the 5th round, MORALES wouldn't have lasted 12 rounds. :hat
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    You forgot Manny's socks disaster, he would have knocked Morales out if it wasn't for those pesky socks
     
  4. nuketurnal

    nuketurnal N-Bomb Full Member

    2,090
    0
    Apr 24, 2010
    one defense I heard.. "atleast morales is coming from a good win."
     
  5. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    5,805
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    the sock disaster was for the first marquez fight moron lol.


    but still marquez should be hanged for fighting a corpse. he should have fought maidana or khan
     
  6. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,043
    Oct 13, 2010


    Actually this fight was only made cause your PED pumpin hero turned Marquez down to fight an equally shot to **** fossil

    Having said that JMMs last prime fight was PEDquiao 2 anyway so at least its more even, unlike your cowards ****ing scandalous decision to hump yet another shot legend's carcus

    Manny - all the drugs and talent in the world - yet still utterly absolutely and Grotesquely adverse to taking on ANY genuine challenge

    :-:)-:)verysad:verysad
     
  7. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    It doesn't have to be 140. I would love to see Jmm vs Soto @ 135
     
  8. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    51
    Sep 8, 2007
    gotta disagree: pac 1 was morales biggest win. he was slight better than the barrera win, more clear a victory and a high ranked p4p fighter
     
  9. Real_Truth

    Real_Truth Guest

    :lol::rofl:lol::rofl You're one idiot ass hater.
     
  10. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    jmm-morales? wtf? should have been a great fight years ago, but just now? gedawta here!

    barrera-morales 4 anyone? lol. just Ulol
     
  11. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    pointless fight, imo
     
  12. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004

    You might be one of the few *******s that may be bright enough to understand this......
    What opponent at 140 lbs and below does Marquez make a better payday than a Morales fight????

    .....thats right, only a Pacquiao fight, and we all know Pacquiao in not interested in getting embarrased for a third time against the same opponent.

    Money is the reason JMM vs Morales will happen.





    .......and as far as Pac-Morales 2 and 3......no one condemned Pacquiao for taking those fights.
    ......financially those fights made perfect sense for Pacquiao to take.....but simply, boxing fans see that Morales had been diminished by that point, and rate the accomplishment accordingly.

    ......Pacquiao beating the version of Morales that he did, does'nt rate that impressive when you consider where Morales was at skillwise and his tremendous burden to dehydrate severely and make weight.

    .......accordingly, a Morales fight for Marquez at this time makes perfect financial sense......but like Pacquiao, the accomplishment will be rated accordingly as Morales even in his comeback fights has not shown he's anywhere close to top tier.


    As you know, I'm a Marquez fan, but I have eyes and will not rate a Morales victory for JMM at anymore than it really is, and that would be a victory over a name and not a top tier caliber fighter.

    .......but let me add however that Pacquiao in facing Mosley, is chosing him even though the bigger payday for him would be vs Marquez........

    .....this is not the case with Marquez in choosing Morales.
    In Marquez chosing Morales, no one at 147 lbs and below offers more of a payday for Marquez than a Morales fight, which is the reason the fight makes sense and will happen.
     
  13. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    The man to the right on your avatar prevents it from happening.......

    ......in fact, instead of hyping Soto for a JMM fight, Arum would prefer Marquez face a fighter not even in his stable, Berto.:lol:
     
  14. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    There is no way JMM is a bigger payday for Pac. It was not for PBF.
     
  15. RightCross

    RightCross Grandmaster of Boxing Full Member

    10,533
    3
    Aug 3, 2004
    JMM just wants $$$. He knows he is getting old and wants to cash in as large as he can. Morales is a name and brings $$$$.

    This isnt a legacy fight, this is a financial fight.