Is Ezzard Charles a top ten Heavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by GPater11093, Feb 17, 2010.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,409
    21,841
    Sep 15, 2009
    Would you call the steele v apostoli rematch a lhw fight?
     
  2. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009

    Because during that era all fighters of 170lb would often fight 190-200lb opponents. Can you find a career lightheavyweight who did not fight heavyweights before 1960? The lightheavyweight title was just a belt for fighters within the heavyweight division who could make 175lb. Until boxing evolved to a time where lightheavyweight was an exclusive weight class that only fought other 175 pounders the division was what it says on the tin. a "light" heavyweight.
     
  3. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,356
    11,392
    Jan 6, 2007
    It would be termed by most as a MW bout, as long as no title was on the line.

    But technically, it was a LHW bout, yes.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,409
    21,841
    Sep 15, 2009
    do you think that fight had more significance in the lhw division or the mw division?
     
  5. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,356
    11,392
    Jan 6, 2007
    Oh, it had no significance whatsoever as a LHW bout.

    It was, for all practical purposes, a MW bout.

    But technically, it was a LHW bout.



    You had mentioned that 180 would be a HW bout whereas 176 wouldn't be.



    I was pulling your chain as a maths teacher. (I thought the emoticon would have indicated that.)

    Since 175 was the limit, anything above that moves things up a division.

    If you start allowing limits (subjectively) other than the official limits, where does it end ?

    You call 176 a LHW and 180 a HW, so presumably there is some boundary between 176 and 180 that you would consider the 'true' boundary.

    But that has already been set, and it's 175 !

    So it was just a technical (and somewhat frivolous) point that I was making.


    In the Greb-Loughran American LHW title bout of January 1923, both men were (166), much closer to 160 than 175.

    Interestingly, and this is in keeping with your viewpoint, later that year, Greb weighed a pound OVER the MW limit when he faced Bryan Downey in a world MW title fight !
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,409
    21,841
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah I knew you were yanking my chain.

    I basically look at a couple pounds each way of the limit depending on where the next limit is.

    I decide whether a fight means more in one division than the other.

    Example anything less that 138 and more than 133 I'd call LW.

    I know there's official limits but i don't pay much attention.
     
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,120
    25,288
    Jan 3, 2007
    Quite possibly the best light heavy ever, and certainly a top 10 p4p. But I just don't think he did enough at heavyweight to warrant making top 10... Too many guys to compete with.
     
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,356
    11,392
    Jan 6, 2007
    :good
     
  9. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009

    he fought more heavyweights than anything else and was a heavyweight the longest. charles was a genuine LH for 18 months yet he was never an exclusive lightheavyweight.
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,409
    21,841
    Sep 15, 2009
    fixed :good
     
  11. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    The Brits recognized Lee Savold actually,but, well.....
     
  12. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    haha:good
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,409
    21,841
    Sep 15, 2009
    No worries!