I do not, but I won't count it towards our score because it was that close and it could have gone either way. So not 2-0, just 1-0. I'm fair!
Agreed but the fight should of gone to kovalev i watched it 3 times and i can't believe they gave it to sob I know your fair mvc which is why you should admit that was not right what happened
I don't think Kovalev won, I had Ward winning close but we'll never agree here. Might as well move on, no 2-0.
It filled me with enormous, patriotic pride. Great Britain's Kell Brook was putting on something of a clinic, but the injury was insurmountable. Frankly, the man had iron balls to fight someone so much bigger, who is the most feared puncher in his own weight class. A true hero.
But that doesn't answer why you chose to "study" the forum "vigorously" before joining. Why would you feel the need to do that?
He was winning on the scorecards, including mine. The fight turned when his orbital got smashed. Skills wise, I think he has the better of it, but it's hard to overcome that size difference against another elite operator.
It got smashed in the second round. Golovkin landed the better more damaging shots and after the second round Brook's accuracy plummeted and that "slip" in the third should have been a knockdown. GGG's boxing isn't flashy at all so it will look like Brook is doing the better work at times and appears more skilled, but he isn't. He's faster, but Golovkin is sharper and more skilled.