Is Floyd more agressive vs Southpaws

bballchump11 trying to explain boxing is like a 5yo trying to explain an internal cumbustion engine... atsch

 

The reason you are so ****in stupid, amongst the myriad of other reasons, is Floyd hasn't fought all that many SP's. And he has fights vs. orthodox fighters where he was obviously more aggressive. Fail....as usual for you in life...

 

That is your specialty. It sure as hell isn't making informed or even semi-intelligent boxing remarks. You're a simple minded, uneducated, ****. :thumbsup

And you won't even attempt to refute what I said.

 

He's usauly more agressive from the fourth round on. Regardless of what handed his oppoent is. He tends to lea with a stright right hand fallowed by a left hook. Which is the Idea for dealing with a southpaw.

 

Cotto did nothing when he was "boxing". When he was trading with Manny he was competitive.

In rds 1-4 when Cotto was aggressive, he landed 13/39 power shots per round. Manny landed 22/43.
In rds 5-12 when he was "boxing", he landed 5/18 per round. Manny landed 23/48.

Jab numbers were fairly consistent for both throughout the fight. All "boxing" did for Cotto was decrease his output and allow Manny to pummel him with no backlash. He did far better when he was aggressive.

 

atsch Yeah, and he ONLY does that vs. lefty's. :roll:

My god you are dense.

 

that's because Cotto's a bumbling slow guy with zero finesse.

 

Rip stated it well, and he's one of you. Tell him how wrong he is chump... atsch

 

I'm just demonstrating why it's common to be aggressive against southpaws, not necessarily if or why Floyd is.

 

More aggressive and more comfortable/relaxed letting the offense flow while being more effective are two different things.

As a couch surfing bum? Two things you wouldn't understand.

 

Cotto won the 1st round when he kept his coo and boxed. He suffered the knockdown 2nd knockdown that killed his chances when he followed emmanuel to trade.