Is Floyd the greatest counterpuncher of all time?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by punchingdove, Sep 19, 2011.


  1. punchingdove

    punchingdove Active Member Full Member

    1,135
    0
    Oct 8, 2010
    oh, my bad, i meant suckerpuncher...
     
  2. MrWonderful

    MrWonderful Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    0
    Feb 2, 2010

    How old are you?

    If you're over 14, go and have an autism test
     
  3. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Yes, if not he's top 3!
     
  4. punchingdove

    punchingdove Active Member Full Member

    1,135
    0
    Oct 8, 2010

    Its something else that we make fun of Floyd or Pac, but that's just plain stupid. You dont know what People with autism or their family go thru!
     
  5. rookie

    rookie Active Member Full Member

    582
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    i would go for top 10 but you can make a case for top 5 since ortiz was a young hungry lion
     
  6. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Riddick Bowe, Terry Norris.

    Norris vs. The rules of boxing was a mismatch.

    "oh he's down, now run halfway across the ring to hit him!"
     
  7. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
    [yt]juI1lXNFqBM[/yt]

    3:36
     
  8. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    4,623
    1
    Feb 17, 2010
    Who makes threads like these? You that bored with your own life noob?
     
  9. punchingdove

    punchingdove Active Member Full Member

    1,135
    0
    Oct 8, 2010

    Who defends floyd? you envy his stupid lifestyle??
     
  10. rookie

    rookie Active Member Full Member

    582
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    what a *****.. lighten up powder puff :rofl
     
  11. Peter Brit

    Peter Brit Member Full Member

    468
    0
    Jun 4, 2010
    No Ortiz is perhaps the most stupid.

    When Floyd fought better fighters in their prime he did not look so good. He is good but do not get swept away with the theory the present is always best.

    Oscar De La Hoya is still his best win and he got beat at his best weight. Floyd caught an old Oscar. Since then he has fought names not the best fighters (were once good is not the same thing). To be fair Ortiz was decent in theory as a first fight back.

    Problem now is, welterweights and light middleweights are not great, even ten years ago they were not on a level with Hearns, Leonard and perhaps Duran.

    He is good enough not to carefully pick his oppentents. I can understand why he does because great boxers always look for an advantage. However the greats wanted to find out if they were the best, not pick fights to try and look great. That is my beefy with Flloyd.
     
  12. NotAnMMAfan

    NotAnMMAfan Guest

    :rofl:rofl:rofl
    Man this guy is mad :|