Is Fury's split excuse valid as a reason or is he ducking Usyk?

And some of us are trying to discreetly read the board during a zoom meeting.

 

When a pattern begins to develop of fights falling through due to money, they don't want the big fights. Fury fought Wilder as he could always blame it on 'one right hand' from Wilder. When it's a genuine boxer vs boxer, and the winner is the better boxer, then he runs a mile

 

For ****s sake. 50/50 is fair enough just ****ing accept you fat ****.;

You've got enough ****ing money.

QUACK QUACK ****ING QUACK.

 

Usyk - Has a better resume, has more belts, and has beaten the better opponent.

 

Usyk is a very poor commercial draw. There is little interest in him outside of hardcore boxing fans and the revenue he generates is peanuts. Hardly surprising him and his 'handlers' want a fair split.

 

The latest input from Counterpunch

This content is protected

I agree with his input

 

Awful exploitation of mod's privileges. Disgrace...

 

Without any prize money means that neither of them get paid anything. Nobody would fight for free whilst allowing their opponent 100% of everything (especially when that opponent is already demanding to fight at home)

 

As 'Big John' said it's about principles. If you concede to one everybody will want concessions so he is right to stand his ground and seek his worth. The more money you have the more people will try and take it from you.

 

This content is protected

Two can play that game.

ready to fight without any prize money but now wont even accept 50%

quack quack

Or, maybe neither of them meant it

 

He might get more.

And any opponent would be easier.

But then could never claim to be the best of his generation.

He's beginning to resemble Floyd circa 2010....the slight favourite, but just not sure he can win, so delay, delay, delay.