Is Gene Tunney overrted?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Hamburger, Mar 8, 2014.


  1. dmille

    dmille We knew, about Tszyu, before you. Full Member

    2,269
    69
    Aug 1, 2004
    If the 5'9 180 lb guy has superior boxing skills, why would he need to go toe-to-toe. Did Jones and Toney go toe-to-toe with Ruiz or did they shut him down with their boxing ability?

    Butterbean champion? Ever?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FYo5w0l2b4
     
  2. Hamburger

    Hamburger Guest

    Marciano boxed now? I am talking about fighters like him. John Ruiz wasn't a good fighter and who did Toney beat at heavyweight who wasn't washed up. Also when was Ruiz great? He was a guy who liked to dry hump guys and get a away it.

    Butterbean didn't have to be champion. He would still knock out Tunney.

    There are exceptions to every rule. If I am naturally 6'5 190 and I fought somebody who is naturally 6.2 230. I could beat that person and I could move up to heavyweight because I have height.

    But if I am a 5'10 180 pound fighter like Marciano who is slow and plodding then there is no chance he is going to beat somebody like Mike Tyson, David Tua, Ike Ibeabuchi or George Foreman.

    Also you keep bring up stuff I didn't ask you dmille just like Janitor. We are talking about Gene Tunney not any other fighters.
     
  3. Hamburger

    Hamburger Guest

    Also Mitch Rose is clearly one PED's. Nobody can knock out the great butterball.
     
  4. dmille

    dmille We knew, about Tszyu, before you. Full Member

    2,269
    69
    Aug 1, 2004
    You can't read his mind. Tunney was white, so you automatically inject race into the equation.

    The man had 85 fights and only lost one. I don't know how that makes him only average.

    Prove a point? It's a dumb analogy because it doesn't work so well if you use Roy Jones or Michael Spinks. And what did I say about Morrison's chin?

    You can read the news reports and you'll find that some guys back in those days were the same kind of 100 punch a round whirlwinds as today's guys.

    Many fights scheduled for 20 or 25 ended in the early rounds the same as today's fights do.

    Just who are you referring to? Compare him to whom?

    As I said Tunney would be a cruiser by today's standards, which is where I rate him.

    You wanna rate him as a cruiser or a light heavy? Be my guest. You don't want to rate him at all? Feel free.

    But please, don't be a douche about it. Okay?
     
  5. Hamburger

    Hamburger Guest

    85 fights wow but again Dmille apparently you are just like like Janitor. How many of those were against modern sized heavyweights? 0

    Did I say you said Morrison had a bad chin? I said people do but Hearns couldn't crack it.

    News paper reports aren't video. A lot of things they reported back then aren't true.

    The Tommy Hearns thing was a great analogy because a poster before you said only skill mattered not size.

    Also Janitor always tries to defend the white fighter just like blacks defend Mayweather.

    I didn't ask you where did you rate Tunney. The question was why do people place him high as a heavyweight when he didn't face any modern sized ones or beat any.

    A douche? Not quite. I ask a question and I get the run around that is the problem.

    If you can't answer the question asked then why bother to type at all?
     
  6. Hamburger

    Hamburger Guest

    Also not losing means you are a great fighter? Then as I told somebody earlier Deontay Wilder must be great then right? Sure he didn't fight anybody but he won so that equates to greatness huh? Also Tunney weighed 175 pounds most of his career so that equates to light heavyweight not cruiserweight so you are off on that too aren't you? He only started to weigh 180 plus toward the end of his career.

    That is like saying because James Toney or Roy Jones are bigger now that is their natural weight classes.
     
  7. TheExpertboxer

    TheExpertboxer Active Member Full Member

    1,211
    6
    Apr 27, 2011
    As a heavyweight he can't be top ten because he didn't do enough. As a fighter he was great.
     
  8. dmille

    dmille We knew, about Tszyu, before you. Full Member

    2,269
    69
    Aug 1, 2004
    Where are you getting this? What did I say about Marciano? You're the one injecting tangents into this conversation.

    During the course of an average day, just how much time to you spend thinking about one guy dry humping another? 45 mins? 2 1/2 hrs?

    So Ruiz wasn't a "good" fighter? I didn't see you fighting him. He'd still whip my @$$ in less than thirty seconds today, if it would take him that long.

    But good job ducking my question. I'll ask it again. Did Jones and Toney go toe-to-toe with Ruiz, or did they use their skills?

    Esch would knocked out Tunney? Please. He lost 10-zip to a 53 year old man. Did you even watch that fight with Mitch Rose? He didn't make it past the second round!!! ANYONE with something coming close to a world class jab would have destroyed Esch.

    If Marciano was so slow and plodding, how did he win any fights at all?

    You won't be convinced no matter what I say, but you did mention logic in one of your posts so I will try. Weren't Tyson and Tua right about the same height as Maricano? In fact, didn't he have a slightly shorter reach?

    I think we can agree that it they ever did fight, it would be a match fought on the inside. Can we at least agree that Marciano was a hard puncher? Can we agree that he'd have at least a small chance of landing something on the inside against Tua or Tyson?

    Foreman I think would have beaten him, if he caught him early. Ibeabuchi was a nut case as his personal life showed. Despite the Tua fight, I don't know if he had the mental toughness.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,109
    48,328
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think there's very little doubt that he's overated as a heavyweight. The guy pops up in top 10 at HW all the time. It's mad.
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,617
    27,303
    Feb 15, 2006
    Top 10 is a stretch, but he might have had the ability to earn a curent top 10 ranking, if he had chosen to.
     
  11. dmille

    dmille We knew, about Tszyu, before you. Full Member

    2,269
    69
    Aug 1, 2004
    I said he was a cruiserweight. Was I not clear about that?

    You make it seem like 85 professional fight are nothing. I had zero pro fights against anyone of any weight. How many did you have?

    Was every newspaper reporter a liar? Or did they only start telling the truth when video came along? Cuz kinda I doubt it.

    And I don't think that getting the runaround when you've asked a question is the problem. It's how you deal with getting the runaround that's making you seem like a douche.

    I'm not familiar with Janitor's posting history, so I could be wrong there. I was merely going by first impressions.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,109
    48,328
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think so too. He looked absolutely exceptional on film. He gives the impression of being much better than a lot of his peers. But. That's all in the cut. The right question is does he belong in the top thirty, not does he belong in the top ten.
     
  13. dmille

    dmille We knew, about Tszyu, before you. Full Member

    2,269
    69
    Aug 1, 2004
    Once again, you're coming off as a douche. Dial it back a notch or three.

    Toward the end of his career? He had recorded weights up to 185 as early as 1921. He was natural cruiser who trained down to 175.
     
  14. Hamburger

    Hamburger Guest

    Top 10 heavyweights of all time yet he never faced a modern sized heavyweight? Hilarious stuff.

    George Foreman
    Lennox Lewis
    Joe Frazier
    Ken Norton
    Muhuamad Ali
    Joe Louis
    Lennox Lewis
    Mike Tyson
    Either Klitschko brother
    David Tua
    Tommy Morrison
    Ike Ibeabuchi
    Evander Holyfield
    Riddick Bowe.
    Gerry Cooney

    I could go on and on and on so how is he a top 10 20 or 30 heavyweight when he never faced any?

    Dmille did I say you said Marciano? Can you read? I would giving you a example. I also didn't ask you did you think he was a good cruiserweight when I told you he was a natural 175 pounder anyway so end of story.

    So you have tons of news paper clippings stating fighters back in those days threw 100s of punches for 25 rounds? Clearly you don't because you are a liar.

    So if you are slow and plodding you will never win a bout huh? Marciano won against 180 pounders, mob controlled fighters and has beens. He didn't beat a lively in his prime fighter that weighed even 180 pounds in their primes.

    Marciano was a hard puncher compared to modern 220 pound heavyweights because of? Because you wish to believe it? Did he knock out any 220 pound world class modern size fighters? No but as I said you want to believe it so it must be true.

    Tyson and Tua both were 220 pounds. Marciano weighed 185. I never brought up a fighters height did I? But again you will talk in circles to try to prove a point. There is no point to be made. Marciano's power was good enough to club 180 pound fighters. He never beat a modern sized heavyweight. Neither did Tunney so end of story.
     
  15. Hamburger

    Hamburger Guest

    Also who said he was a natural cruiserweight and trained to be a light heavy? You? Your proof? Wait you never have any proof. Most of his career he weighed 175 or so. Then from 1925 to 1928 he fought at over 180 or so. As I said a natural light heavy who fought higher toward the end of this career.

    His best wins were over a shot Jack Dempsey who was overrated himself and against Harry Greb a middleweight / super middleweight. But apparently that makes you great now.