No they not have Caucasoid traits or have very little, at least pure Tatars, therefore not qualified to be Caucasian (white) race.
The guy was referring to Alina Golovkin who's half Tatar, but I believe she is half Crimean Tatar which is very watered down white Ukrainian version, pure Tatars are Asian Euro hybrids. Who gives a **** she's a blond white girl with slightly slanted eyesatsch
this whole thread is stupid just enjoy the fighters you ******s.who cares if he's white black green or purple.
blah blah ... the Stanford professor spent his life doing this. It all goes back to ASIAN power. You must have some agenda to go only go back so far to fit your argument. HE'S YOUR EXPERT REFERENCE!
And this is his research, I've been reading him a hell of a lot longer than your quick perusing of his research, looking for facts to justify your own agenda. For the record I love Asians, I not sure why anyone wouldn't like Asians. I'm the one who says there is little difference between Whites and Asians they both branched off from the same DNA line. I have no agenda I've studied all of this stuff for 15 years and it irritates me when people who don't anything about complicated subject matter, get on forums and start spouting off about **** they basically have no understanding of. And I'm not necessarily talking about you markq
Does he or does he not claim Europeans trace their evolution back to 2/3 ASIAN and 1/3 AFRICAN? Simple question. Fifteen years of research should be able to answer YES or NO. My agenda was replying to the original OP that GGG is the best ASIAN boxer today.
He says what I laid out earlier its far more complicated than your willing to attempt to understand, because you have a pro Asian agenda
Here is your answer. Europeans and Asians share 2/3 of the same DNA the other 1/3 is Arab African that went into Europe through a different migration pattern.Does that answer your question, Asians are part European, Europeans are part Asian because we are directly related.