For what ? Other than his wins over Tarver all he has had is some really good losses ..I love the guy but he hasn't done anything HOF worthy ..
When I say 'definitely' I mean I think he has done enough, just. To be remembered there. Bearing in mind, I actually think he won his last fight, against the 'Bad' one.
Knocking out a past prime great fighter DOES NOT get you a spot in the hall of fame. I think he has been hard done by in his career, but realistically all he has is tarver and an old Jones. Not enough for the HOF by a long shot.
The problem is, even his best wins were for the most part against guys that WEREN'T holding titles. Griffin, Ulrich, Harding, Jones and then getting a couple of dubious decisions against him earlier in his career. I think ability wise, he is a better fighter then his resume suggests though.
So I suppose you think future dominance of the light heavyweight division Dawson was just a bit 'green' when Johnson fought him to a standstill... except it wasn't really a standstill because Chad was on his fookin bike for half of the bout. Or do you think Dawson very overrated?
Dominance??? He lost a close decision. What fight did you watch. Great effort yes, but losing a close decision doesn't get you into the HOF pal, nice try hahaha. Based on your criteria, every one time title holder and challenger who puts up a great perfomance in losing for the title would get in.
No, I diddn't mean the fight was a dominance, I was talking about the DOMINANT DAWSON, as in dominant rising star of LHW. I actually think the fight was very close but feel like Johnson did enough, do the words effective and aggression mean anything?