Is Golvkin the best middleweight ever?

Trinidad, the superior fighter hits Bummyluvkin with a chunky left hook in the first round just like he did to Vargas and Bummy goes on ***** street the rest of the night. From there on it's only the beginning of the end, Trinidad's body punches, stamina and ATG punching power has Bummy out of there in the 9th round.

You simply CANNOT slug it out with Trinidad and make it out of there alive. You have to be an ATG pure boxer, and as far as I can tell, GGG likes slugging it out and eating leather on the face.

 

Don't care, I don't count regular titles, record book can say whatever it wants to.

 

Cmon Larry. You know he's not the best. Far too unproven to even be discussed with the likes of Hagler and Hopkins ect. So I say Hell No!

 

I think Ward could be great.

 

I was at the scene and Stax on deck said HI!

 

The forum's full of trolls and casuals.

It's took a huge nosedive in the past few years.

I think GG's great for the sport, but his deluded fans are going to turn people against him. People are going to want to see him struggle/lose just to rid the crazy hype and the annoying, ignorant fans who've got no knowledge or respect for the fighters of the past.

 

Wow!

I'm in awe.

I just hope for your own sake that you're just having a joke.

 

14 defenses and 9 of them were against scrubs. But even if we discount them, nothing wrong with 5 good defenses.

 

Hold up what??? you hating on the God, everything he touching disappears he defines the blood sport. You are not worthy to see him grace the ring peasant

 

I think he is. Robinson was more of a welterweight. Same goes with Leonard and Hearns. Other than that you have Hagler and Jones, i would put my money on GGG against them.

In my view he is, yes.

 

Most of these type posters are trolls or GGG haters. This is exactly what they want to happen

 

no

 

You can't be serious?

 

:good