This. He's well behind Wlad and Vitali and there's nothing he can do about it until he beats one of them.
NO, not quite yet... he will have to beat a bigger name within the division to even place... most likely will have to be one othe the K bros... until then, he will be left out of the ratings...
No way lets talk after he fights a Klitchko, i dont even have the klits in my top 10, but they are very close.
this is the correct answer. all that haye needs to break the top 10 is an american passport, hbo and ring magazine backing. those rankings stink of stale **** :deal
Haye has an equal or better claim than numbers five to ten on the Ring's list. But so do some others as well.
Three of the The Ring's top ten have not won more fights than they lost in the past 12 months. Two of them haven't won at all in the past 12 months. Within the next few weeks, Williams and Caballero will only have one win in a 12 month period. Mayweather only has one win in two years. How can you have a top ten of boxers based on current form when six of the top ten will only have four wins between them in the previous year?
he fought at 190lbs and now fights 221lbs, thats 30lbs of weight , thats like floyd fighting at 160, hes P4P no 1 yadda yada yada toney ko
It won't be long before he has to be considered worthy. He's been a titlist at 2 weights (undisputed champ at one of them), all within 25 fights. If Miguel Cotto still remains on the list after the year he has had and if Shane Mosley remains on the list when he hasn't fought in over a year then haye deserves a mention. Also... to the guy who said that Wlad and Vitaly belong above him, why does that logic not apply to cotto as he's beaten shane? Am i the only person who thinks that Haye has a better arguement to be included than Chad Dawson?
No, I agree. But I also think Dawson has a better argument than Donnaire, Hopkins, Williams, Caballero and Cotto...