Is Hearns more iconic than Hagler?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PernellSweetPea, May 26, 2010.

  1. RickyRicardo

    RickyRicardo Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Messages:
    328
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hearns had 7 fights against legit legends which were superfights. Cuevas,2 Leonard,Benitez,Duran,Hagler, Hill. Hagler had 3- Duran,Hearns,Leonard. Hearns had bigger fights and it spread over a longer period. 11 years for Hearns, 4 years for Hagler.
     
  2. P.4.P.G.O.A.T.

    P.4.P.G.O.A.T. Q Boro Killa Bee Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,259
    Likes Received:
    4
    I think it's Tommy (as much as I love The Marvelous One). One punch KO power up there with the best. Longer career than Marvin, dominance across more weight classes, only guy to KO Duran.
     
  3. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    22,661
    Likes Received:
    4
    I have them 19 and 20 on my top 50 ATG p4p list. I have Hearns slightly higher even though he lost to hagler because of resume and Career span.
     
  4. CassiusClayAli

    CassiusClayAli Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,050
    Likes Received:
    14
    interesting question. Hearns fought more great fighters at different weights so you know where to place him and his greatness. Hagler never moved up like Hearns did and probably would not have done as well as Hearns moving up. Hearns is more iconic. Hagler was a great middleweight, but Hearns was multiweight,multichamp just fought everywhere and everyone. Hagler did well at his weight class, but Hearns had more versatility to fight different styles and weights and his fight films are historic. Look at that iceveins video. Tommy was unreal.