Is Hector Camacho an all time great?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, Oct 12, 2011.


  1. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    119
    Jun 30, 2008
    No. Very talented, but overrated even in that regard.
     
  2. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    405
    Jun 14, 2006
    Yeah, it's hard to argue with this.
     
  3. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    I dont understand when some say he had the potential to be but didnt reach his potential. what else was he supposed to achive that he didnt do?
     
  4. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    Well since he didn't beat Chavez and Tito in big fights, and was beaten rather easily in both those fights as well as losing to Haugen in that point deduction fight, he could have fought Whitaker at 135 or 140 and beat him or get a decent 140 reign going. He didn't defend his titles much, and then he won the WBO title which was a decent reign but no much great names. He did not win another legit title after 140. The way he fought at 130 you would think he could have had a career like Whitaker, and he did not. Not close. I thought his potential was that he could have been a superfight fighter. What great wins did he have? He is HOF for sure, but not ATG.
     
  5. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    34
    Jul 24, 2004
    Arguello and Nelson were lead-footed fighters. No way could they keep up with Camacho. MAB was not good enough at 130 and I think Chacon would get stopped. Flash and PBF may have beaten him. There are not many fighters that could have beaten Camacho at 130. Besides Meldrick Taylor, Camacho was the fastest fighter I ever saw. Let's not forget that Camacho was knocking guys out with his speed at 130.
     
  6. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    Hector Camacho IS a modern ATG, more worthy of the acolade over many that have since followed him!!!
     
  7. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing

    25,275
    19,827
    Apr 26, 2006
    :deal :bbb
     
  8. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    70
    Aug 18, 2009
    Camacho is 1 of d greatest 50 fighters of all times 4 sure .
    Which means that he was greater than most HOFers .
     
  9. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    No way is he an ATG. But his win over JLR was highly impressive stuff, as was his blitzing of Limon.
     
  10. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    139
    Jul 6, 2007
    Today he would be considered one. In the context of his career, I would say no.
     
  11. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    139
    Jul 6, 2007
    Camacho could have achieved more. He had bad drug problems, was a lazy trainer and didnt always give it his best.
     
  12. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,262
    2,478
    Mar 26, 2005
    Ahhhhhh,....no...
     
  13. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    31
    Feb 16, 2010
    IMO, he's an absolute monster h2h @130-140 and I do believe that he deserves to be in the HOF BUT I do not believe he's a p4p atg...nor is he in my top 10 in any of the weight classes he fought at. Oh and to answer the OP's question on who be favored over whom, '82-'83 Camacho'd be a threat to any SFW in history.