is helenius a threat to wlad

Thompson was and still is a far more skillful fighter than Robbie. His handspeed ins't that different either and his footwork is better. But he did have the opportunity to spar with Wlad lots. This alone gave him a massive advantage over other opponents. If Robbie was a regular sparring partner he would also have more success.

Tony is also a southpaw.

 

I just didnt give you the Chisora fight as an example i gave you, the Peters fight and the fight with Sergi and for the record he didnt look
his best even when stopping a faded Brewster so i beleive thts four
examples of him looking like **** in a row i think. Next before attacking
someone because they disagree with your views, why dont you take a
second to read the whole posts dick

 

:rasta

 

It's not asking if he is a threat to Eddie Chambers. It's asking about Wladimir ****ing Klitschko. Helenius is not a top 10 HW. The question is somewhat absurd on that ground alone.

I understand 100% what you say about styles making fights... That's obvious. But Chisora would not have been considered a top 20 HW going into their fight and he absolutely destroyed Helenius. It would be different if Chisora were a badass fighter of unknown potential who had fought like a badass before facing Helenius. He was not. But for the first time in his career, 14-1 Chisora looked like a badass. That speaks VERY poorly for Helenius. Besides, you claim the K bros use their size so well and that is the key to their dominance, now are you saying that Chisora's lack of height is in any way an advantage, or that perhaps Wlad would be better if he were shorter? (your response will surely include a statement about Chisora being underrated despite 100% of everyone claiming Klitschko/Chisora December 2010 was one of the worst signed fights ever and then something about Chisora finally being in shape, blah blah blah...)

 

He beat Sam Peter 9 rounds to 3, clearly.

Peter got 3 10-8 rounds, that is why he "barely" got by him.

Besides, fans are supposed to use their own eyes to score fights and KD's. If you were the ref, would you have scored any of the 3 KD's actual knockdowns?











(They were all rabbit punches, if you haven't watched the fight, which it sounds like...)

 

:roll:
56-3 49 ko's really sucks

 

who hacked KOMAN600's account ? hes taking up for Wlad now? i need another drink.....

 

No. Wlad will KO this stiff boxer with a left hook like Ray Austin.

 

I was at the fight jagoff. And I own it on video. Two of the KD were legit one wasnt. For you to say none are shows your stupidity even the most blind Klithuggers at least give Peter the one KD.:verysad

 

i love this post..it shows your a ****ing clueless nitwit..you manage to compare helenius and thompson but forget one major factor between helenius and thompson which is why thompson had the little success he did..also helenius makes thompson look like khan ffs..go home

 

having a sore hand isnt being injured.the thing wasnt even broke u nancy boy..hes meant to be a ****ing boxers but cant take a little pain in his hand from some swelling??and yet you make fun of haye for a toe issue..have a swollen hand and using it as an excuse is as bad as haye using his toe excuse..and yes wlad would and has fought with broken hand before..

 

im sure you could confirm or quash this chef..has wlad ever fought with hand injurys??

 

you where at the fight.and you cant realise how good wladimir is..??having been knockdown 3 times he still won the fight by a wide ud lol..i somehow think that points to him being a ****ing outstanding boxer to be knock down 3 times and win how he did..considering where he was not so long ago before the fight..have you got any kind of knowledge of the game??what can helenius do that will give wlad trouble??he sucks at everything needed to beat him..he dosnt even have a ****ing jab..yes a jab the most important punch in boxing and helenius dosnt have one..helenius is the randy orton of boxing..he only beats up old men...