Is Hopkins currently one of the best 15 fighters in the world? If so, why?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Decebal, Mar 19, 2008.


  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,569
    16,099
    Jul 19, 2004
    Shove the question up your ass, fanboy, and prepare for Calzaghe's first loss at the hands of the great Bernard Hopkins.
    :smoke
     
  2. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    :lol:

    What I don't know is "Why" he should be considered in the top 15.:good
     
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,569
    16,099
    Jul 19, 2004
    Then you're in for a pleasant surprise.

    :smoke
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    That would be fun too!
     
  5. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    He's not been that great since he was at 154, his strength and size advantage has been absent at 160 and above.

    Realistically, he's an extremely overrated fighter who's faults are never looked at. An excellent fighter at 154, top class, a good fighter at 160(just good, see the Soliman, Quartey and Taylor fights)and he looked just **** terrible at 170.

    The story on Wright is that he's one of the best ever at 154 H2H and has a decent resume there and that when he's moved up he's lost effectiveness.

    His resume though is quite overrated. He had a serious style and size advantage over Mosely, yet Mosely still took the fight very close in their rematch(that's a negative IMO), Mosely isn't a potent LMW at all, then of course he shutout a past prime Trinidad with a serious style advantage. Then he struggled with Soliman, drew with Taylor, then beat Quartey in a semi-competitive fight where Quartey was actually doing well early on, Quartey is also shot and a former Welter coming off of a controversial loss to an unhealthy Forrest and a struggle against Verno Phillips.

    These things are just not looked at.

    Add in the embarassing loss to Vasquez, the close but fair loss to Vargas(winky fans are ridiculous) and the loss to Harry Simon and I think it's clear that he's become extremely overrated and the people who call him an ATG should be examined.

    Though, when you outclass overmatched BIG NAMES, this tends to happen, nobody noticed that Winky was excellent before hand even though it was obvious that he was a highly skilled fighter who was potent at 154, H2H a top 5 at that weight!

    Right now he loses to any good MW and that's a shallow division.

    There's my assessment.:good
     
  6. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Interesting that every time someone disagrees with me, I am called a fanboy. I am a fanboy of Bute against everyone at SMW, a fanboy of Kessler against Bute, a fanboy of Calzaghe against everyone at SMW, a fanboy of Froch and Inkin against American SMWs, a fanboy of Dawson against other American fighters around that weight...etc.etc... guess I am a fanboy of boxing then!:roll:
     
  7. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Well if we all adopt the IntentionalButt-Huki-Amsterdamic P4P criteria, he wouldn't even be top 20, top 25 being generous because he's still a top 7 or so LHW on trickyness and experience, that's about it.:yep

    I doubt he'd defeat Danny Green mate, he's well past his best.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    I don't have anything else for you if that's what you mean. It's enough for me that:

    He's stepped up two weight divisions and beaten the incumbant champion.

    He's beaten a future hall of famer who was himself stepping up to 175 from 160 for the first time.

    He has proven his ability to win ugly in his last two outings. I don't consider that anyone outside of the absolute elite would beat him at this time.
     
  9. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Thank you. I agree that Winky was a truly outstanding 154 fighter and that in his prime, he was one of the best in the world.:good

    ...but that was then and this is now...

    ...Hopkins was probably the best in the world at his peak...but that was then and this is now...
     
  10. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Rumsfeld knows nothing about boxing, don't even bother. He's grown on me some, I kind of like some of his politics now and would be a drinking/partying friend from a distance, but his boxing posts are still down at the bottom.:yep
     
  11. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Thank you.

    Who are those members of the absolute elite that you think would beat him, currently?
     
  12. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    I met Winky Wright, he's a nice guy, I don't like slating him, but these Winky fans(mostly just apologists that relate to that shit****er Jermain Taylor and Hopkins nutriders)are just getting ridiculous.

    If he was so potent at 160, he would have TOOLED Soliman, who was molested by Anthony Mundine(Mundine DIDNT EVEN TRY, just PLAYED AROUND) and lost handily to Bika in the contender. Granted that's a division above, but Soliman even dropped some rounds to the C level Ornelas.

    Get my drift mate? I like Sam, but he's a C+ fighter at best, a fun fighter and a great guy and even a credit to the sport, he's been in with some serious comp and always entertains, but you shouldn't be losing 5 and arguably 6 rounds to him. Winky barely edged that fight.

    Hopkins got so much credit for beating Wright, imagine if Wright stepped in with Calzaghe and got brutally massacred(SOLIMAN was a bad style apparantley with awkwardness and workrate), they'd all say 'Wright sucks at 168'....

    NO **** GUYS.:lol:

    I wouldn't give Joe any credit either, just like I don't give Hoppy much credit for that win.:yep

    And in being fair, I'll only give Joe credit if he obliterates Hopkins, even dropping a round and I'll say it's not much of a win and if he doesn't stop him, ain't much of a win either. A blowout will recieve some credit, because I don't think many LHW's would blow out Hops even if they beat him.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    As you know I consider Calzaghe a huge favourite. But I would make him a favourite over Pavlik at 175. I think I would pick him to beat Kessler even now, although that would be an interesting one (Kessler makes my fifteen).

    There are no other elite in or around his wieght for me.

    Calzaghe. & Calzaghe is top 4, p4p.
     
  14. bill poster

    bill poster Guest

    This content is protected
    Express delivery for Hopkins
     
  15. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    I'd take these guys over the current Hops -

    Green
    Johnson
    Woods
    Erdei
    Dawson(obvious)
    Diaconu
    Calzaghe

    That's about it.