Is it a big deal to you if Pac-Cotto is a non-title fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Blue_Ray, Jul 23, 2009.


Page 3 of 3
  1. general

    general UNDISPUTED Full Member

    380
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    Title fight is always better than non-title fight
     
    general, Jul 23, 2009
    general, Jul 23, 2009
    #31
  2. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    If Pac wanted a welterweight title, he should have said "okay" to 147.
     
    booradley, Jul 23, 2009
    booradley, Jul 23, 2009
    #32
  3. joe6991

    joe6991 Member Full Member

    232
    0
    Jun 7, 2009
    i think if Pac is willing to let Cotto fight as a true ww then the belt should be on the line but if he wants it at heavy light welter then he cant complain about no title
     
    joe6991, Jul 23, 2009
    joe6991, Jul 23, 2009
    #33
  4. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    1,723
    Nov 20, 2007
    Yeah, because PacMan would be the sole 7 division champ if I'm right.

    Now here's the millions dollar question for Pac fans rooting for the catchweight. Wouldn't that freakin' 2 pounds more worth for PacMan to be the only 7 division champion ever?
     
    BigBone, Jul 23, 2009
    BigBone, Jul 23, 2009
    #34
  5. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    I may have used the wrong term in "official" but what I basically mean is that the WBO belt should be on the line according to the offer sheet.

    Clear enough for you . . . tool? :yep

    Here read this: http://www.examiner.com/x-5699-NY-B...4-Cottos-strap-up-for-grabs-by-Manny-Pacquiao
     
    psychopath, Jul 25, 2009
    psychopath, Jul 25, 2009
    #35
  6. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    No
     
    Farmboxer, Jul 25, 2009
    Farmboxer, Jul 25, 2009
    #36
  7. HyperBone

    HyperBone Silverback Gorilla Full Member

    7,152
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    yes it is, for formalities sake:deal
     
    HyperBone, Jul 25, 2009
    HyperBone, Jul 25, 2009
    #37
  8. stiga

    stiga Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,654
    0
    May 27, 2009
    second motion my freind...
     
    stiga, Jul 25, 2009
    stiga, Jul 25, 2009
    #38
Page 3 of 3