Is it acceptable that Wlad NEVER fought Sanders ever again?

Byrd made him quit. Only Klitlickers believes Vitali dominated.

Past peak. Still considered to be one the top dogs at the time.

Lewis era was considered strong because there where boxers like Tua around. It's up to you if you want to buy into it or not.

I hardly know who he is. If he has no other high profile names on his resume I would say no.

 

Yes he is. His resume surpass Vitalis by far.

 

Why are you mad?

 

I actually wondered that myself. I am one of the more vocal Klitschko fans here on ESB, but I have no idea why people goes bananas when the siblings are questioned. This is an Internet message board for boxing. Obviously, the dominating HW champ will be discussed.

 

Total Punches

Klitschko: 230-413 56%
Sanders: 52-229 22%

Power Punches

Klitschko: 171-285 60%
Sanders: 42-139 30%

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

How is that possible when Vitali's last loss came @ the hands of Lennox Lewis and Vitali owns the W over Corrie Sanders?

What the hell kind of math are you using?

Vitali also doesn't have the three KO losses to journeymen on his record like Wlado does.

There's more than enough room to make an argument that Vitali has the better resume.

 

Lucky for Wolattymyr he's got big brother to rescue him when he's flopping around like a fish out of the water from left hands against a professional golfer turned professional boxer. :rofl

 

This content is protected

Look at Quitali's face:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

It does not improve your resume to get beaten by ATG's. Since I dont understand that argument I cant reply to it.

Vitali avenged Wlads loss to Sanders. Wlad avenged Vitalis loss to Byrd. That puts them in an equal position.

Wlad has beaten more high profile fighters over a longer time.

Brewster was no journeyman, and Wlad avenged that loss. The two remaining losses are embarassing. But two losses after sixty fights is not much.

Sanders is a relevant argument, but it does not outweight Wlads other achievements in the sport. After Sanders flattened Wlad, he has beaten guys that were a lot better.

 

Wrong.

When Vitali beat Sanders, he was the #1 HW in the world and hasn't lost since. This plain and simple fact ALONE is enough to warrant rating Vitali ahead of Wlado.

BS.

Wlad's two best wins have come against guys who didn't even start their careers as HWs.

Lol.

Are you kidding me? Brewster was a dead man walking in the rematch.

Really?

Like WHO?

 

Unacceptable!

 

Yes, you insignificant little **** are probably the only one on the planet who doesn't recognize him as the HW champ.

 

Regardless of Sanders ranking at the time, Byrd has a resume that is a lot better.

Vitalis best win is Sam Peter. Both Haye and Byrd have accomplished more at HW than Sam Peter.

Nothing Wlad could do about it.

Byrd, Haye, Ibragimov, Thompson.