Is it fair the the IBF will not allow Kubrat Pulev to defend his EBU title?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by freedom2013, Mar 20, 2013.


Page 1 of 2
  1. freedom2013

    freedom2013 Boxing Junkie banned

    8,424
    6
    Jan 12, 2013
    Kubrat Pulev became the European (EBU) heavyweight champion in May 2012 by defeating Alexander Dimitrenko last year.

    Then, Kubrat defeated Alexander Ustinov in the opening round of the IBF's four man eliminator back in September 2012.

    He was supposed to fight Tomasz Adamek in the final, but Adamek dropped out. Now, the IBF is making Pulev wait for more long months for the winner of Cunningham-Fury. There is no guarantee Fury will fight Pulev if he wins.

    Sauerland planned to put Pulev into a EBU title defense this spring instead of remaining inactive until he fights the winner of Cunningham-Fury.

    However, the IBF has decided that Pulev will lose his status and not be allowed to fight in the final eliminator if he defends the EBU belt of takes an interim stay-active fight.

    Is this fair? Why will the IBF not allow him to retain his ranking as the #1 IBF contender if he takes a fight to stay active?

    When Eddie Chambers dropped out of the last four-fighter IBF eliminator, instead of fighting somebody else, Tony Thompson was declared IBF mandatory. But when Adamek dropped out, Pulev has to wait many months because the IBF has set up another semi-final eliminator. Does the IBF have a double standard?

    "Inactivity ruins a fighter" - Cus D'Amato
     
    freedom2013, Mar 20, 2013
    freedom2013, Mar 20, 2013
    #1
  2. freedom2013

    freedom2013 Boxing Junkie banned

    8,424
    6
    Jan 12, 2013
    And from what I'm reading today, Tyson Fury may decide to fight David Haye instead for a bigger payday, so Pulev's long period of inactivity will be for nothing.
     
    freedom2013, Mar 20, 2013
    freedom2013, Mar 20, 2013
    #2
  3. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,133
    23,692
    Jul 21, 2012
    Pulev should of automatically became mandatory challenger to Wlad just like Thompson did.
    IBF are currrently being accused of corruption and with Pulev being lowballed, who Wlad would not be happy to fight shows k2 are probably in on it as well.
     
    dinovelvet, Mar 20, 2013
    dinovelvet, Mar 20, 2013
    #3
  4. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    not really fair that they are keeping him so inactive
     
    damian38, Mar 20, 2013
    damian38, Mar 20, 2013
    #4
  5. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,060
    27,805
    Jan 18, 2010
    He should jab these IBF guys the F out! :!:
     
    Robney, Mar 20, 2013
    Robney, Mar 20, 2013
    #5
  6. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    I know where this is going......
     
    DrMo, Mar 20, 2013
    DrMo, Mar 20, 2013
    #6
  7. BOGART

    BOGART Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,903
    259
    Jul 19, 2004
    Pulev should be able to defend his title while waiting for his shot. By the time he faces the Fury-Cunningham winner he'll have been off a year if he doesn't fight first.

    I'm skeptical Fury even faces Pulev if he beats Cunningham. He seems to be talking aobut every fighter(regardless of weight) besides Pulev. If Cunningham were to upset Fury I'd guess he'd still face Pulev.
     
    BOGART, Mar 20, 2013
    BOGART, Mar 20, 2013
    #7
  8. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    i agree jab them. then a overhand right :lol:
     
    Boxing Fanatic, Mar 20, 2013
    Boxing Fanatic, Mar 20, 2013
    #8
  9. Malden

    Malden 006 Full Member

    14,631
    1
    Aug 18, 2011
    :yep
     
    Malden, Mar 20, 2013
    Malden, Mar 20, 2013
    #9
  10. zxcvbnm

    zxcvbnm #TeamHWFuture Full Member

    4,245
    4
    May 29, 2010
    Is there anything stopping him having a non-title stay-busy fight?

    If they're not letting him have one of those either that's a ****ing joke.
     
    zxcvbnm, Mar 20, 2013
    zxcvbnm, Mar 20, 2013
    #10
  11. freedom2013

    freedom2013 Boxing Junkie banned

    8,424
    6
    Jan 12, 2013
    The IBF has decided he cannot have an interim fight to defend his EBU title without losing his status as the IBF #1 contender and his place in the next final eliminator.

    That's definitely not fair - inactivity ruins a fighter.
     
    freedom2013, Mar 20, 2013
    freedom2013, Mar 20, 2013
    #11
  12. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,434
    1,011
    Mar 6, 2011
    Maybe he'll be forced into a 'sparring' fight minus the headgear and what have you like Povetkin vs Seldon a few years back.
     
    Manning, Mar 20, 2013
    Manning, Mar 20, 2013
    #12
  13. JohnH

    JohnH Guest

    Wasn't Price supposed to fight Pulev once he beat Thompson. At least that was the plan...
     
    JohnH, Mar 20, 2013
    JohnH, Mar 20, 2013
    #13
  14. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,219
    5,826
    Oct 5, 2009
    I think Pulev should have been activated for Mandatory
     
    KO KIDD, Mar 20, 2013
    KO KIDD, Mar 20, 2013
    #14
  15. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    No one is forcing Pulev not to fight. The IBF has not control if he decides to fight or not. Seems like he's trying to cash out because its an incredibly bad career move to have only 17 fights, be inactive and than go to Wlad. He has other options such as climbing the rankings of another org. Would Wlad not give him a voluntary defense? That would be odd considering he gave shots to Wach and Pianeta, neither who are true world class fighters.
     
    JAB5239, Mar 20, 2013
    JAB5239, Mar 20, 2013
    #15
Page 1 of 2