Is It Fair To Label Lucian Bute The #1 SMW?

Froch is number 2. But then when Kessler lost he moved up to 1.

 

Who is better than Pascal that Bute has fought?

 

Hell no.

 

Froch was not number 2, he was at best number 3 before Bute knocked Andrade out. I'm not boxrec or the Ring, so I can have my own rules. For me, the way you win counts. Froch did not win impressively against Dirrell, he should even have a loss on his record. And Abraham did better than him against Taylor. For me, he can't be number 1.

 

Which Pascal? The one who fought against Froch or the one who became serious, trains hard, follows the strategy and won twice against Diaconu?

 

Your out of line. Hell, I have Froch ranked #2 at LHW since he beat Jean Pascal the WBC LHW Champ. You are way underrating Froch's impressive boxing skills.

 

Pascal lost to Froch. Nuff said.
BTW I never said they were better than Pascal. I said Pascal isn't neccessarily better than them.

 

Underrated resume...I agree that many don't give Froch the due and justified credit there, but IMPRESSIVE BOXING SKILLS ????? That's pushing it too hard.... He has heart, stamina, a good chin and power but his skills impress no one except his fans...

 

Nope.

 

#1 ranked but not the champ

 

The problem is all three of them have accomplish less at 168lbs then Andrade.

Andrade has wins over Mack, Stieglitz & Tsypko.

Taylor had a win over Lacy.
Pascal had wins over... nobody.
Dirrell had wins over... nobody.

 

Impressive boxing skills? Stfu you ******ed biased england fan. Saying Froch have an underrated impressive boxing skills is like saying Mayorga is a slicker boxer then Mayweather.

 

What does that mean? :huh Don't tell me your trying to say because Pascal lost to Froch he isn't any good.

 

Erm I think theirs only one Pascal if I'm right... :blood

 

:good Thats exactly what I'm saying.