Is it fair to say now that Calzaghe's win over Hopkins trumps any win Mayeather has?

no Hopkins was winning until he gassed out due to him being old, then joe clawed it back on inaccurate ineffective volume.

so not really, mayweather has never had such a sloppy victory nor waited till someone is 40something to fight them (though he does cherrypick, nowhere near like joe does)

 

You need to watch more boxing and do less posting Harold.

 

scorecards is all you need, you flop mate.

you want people to watch that cruddy fight again? haha. good luck with that.

 

You called Brook v Porter a robbery because Brook clinched, yet you call Hopkins v Calzaghe, and Dirrell v Froch robbery's where the loser in those fights clinched a hell of a lot more than Brook!atschatsch

We can see your agenda here- you only support the black guys.

And you give Calzaghe no credit for moving up in weight, travelling to the US and beating Hopkins.....yet you still think 8 YEARS later, Hopkins can drop down in weight travel to England and easily school Froch (who' Zaggers ducked according to you)...bit of a contradiction.

Your racist agenda has been exposed.

 

Brook beat Porter.

Hop/Cal I had a draw. Many think Hop won. The scorecards were horrific.

Amir khan is a fraud.

Froch can fight. Harrison never panned out. Khan never rematched prescott.
PEDs exist in the UK. They exist everywhere. Joe Calzaghe was great. He's not greater than Jones was or Toney. But he's great.

SuperHans hates anyone who supports black fighters and he's a **** poster. #Fact

 

they key word is 43. age, not race.

 

As a Brit myself I know that Floyd has multiple wins better than Calzaghe's win over Hopkins.

 

Hans is a gent and a scholar, he knows his boxing.

 

No he doesn't. What are you his alt or agent lol?

 

Here is just a small example of my boxing knowledge. This is a post from Sept 2013:

[url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=488929&highlight=inoue[/url]

And LO AND BEHOLD who should win fighter of the year in 2014....none other than Naoya Inoue.

Here is an example of your boxing knowledge:

Sorry Mr. Pibb, but I'm leagues above you, clearly. :hi:

 

This isn't boxing knowledge. This comes down to opinion. I predicted that Garcia would beat Matthysse, you didn't. I predicted that Garcia would beat Khan you didn't. Under your many alts, you know deep down what is really lol...

Now just stfu lol... I'm going to pick against GG until he fights someone with a pulse so if using that example makes you feel better, good lol...

 

The reason you even came up with this alt is because of Danny Garcia lol...

 

Nope. You believed Broner to be a future pound for pound player, and I believed Inoue. I can identify the hype jobs (like Broner) from the genuine articles (like Inoue).

And if I made this 'alt' because Garcia beat Matthysse, then maybe you should check my joining date (before yours) and see when the fight actually took place.

Here is my prediction of the Garcia- Matthysse fight, where I acknowledge that a Garcia points win wouldn't suprise me in the slightest:

[url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=473733&highlight=garcia&page=3[/url]

We all know however why you picked against Lucas- because you don't like his skin colour. :-(