Is it me or Pac is nuts for trying to make a fight with Hatton.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Blaze, Jun 10, 2008.


  1. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  2. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    :nutcase
     
  3. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    5,805
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    yes he is nuts but pac has balls and would not let this fight pass him by. he ducks no one lol
     
  4. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    FLOYD FOUGHT HATTON AS WELL...AN UNBEATEN HATTON THAT WAS RANKED #8 IN THE WORLD...SO HOW IS THAT PAC HAD BALLS AND FLOYD WAS A *****? THEY BOTH FIGHT THE SAME RICKY AND THE ONE THAT FOUGHT FLOYD WAS CLEARLY A MUCH DIFFERENT AND BETTER FIGHTER:huh

    UR POSTS DON'T COUNT AS NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY YOU WILL HAVE NOTHING TO BACK UR OPINION WITH...NO FACTS OR SOURCES..
     
  5. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    Never really understood why Pac-Hatton was as polarizing as it was. The eventual outcome was glaringly obvious long before the announcement of the fight.
     
  6. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    5,805
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    Floyd is much bigger than Hatton and he fights hatton only when Hatton is blown up at 147.

    Floyd is a chicken and a *****. I don't need sources to confirm this i just think something is wrong with him and his selection of opponents, so it could be true he is a chicken lol. I'm not definitely confirming it but i wouldn't be surprised if its found out he is indeed a chicken lmao. And if you are looking for more arguments, margarito called him out to take a BOXING TEST in the ring, he didn't even bother to respond, just says he got paid 20M for Baldomir lol. Paul Williams called him out for a BOXING TEST, he didn't wanna take the TEST, he wouldn't even TEST with Cotto saying cotto's PPV draw weakens him lol. He's taking the BOXING TEST with a One-year layed off Mosley--and God i wish he'd take this test-- because he's got no choice and Mosley has been weakened by inactivity already lol.

    Its confirmed, mayweather is a chicken :hi:
     
  7. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    U EXAGGERATING FIRST OFF..SAID HE GOT 12 MILLION FOOL....AND IF YOU DON'T REMEMBER RIGHT HE WAS GOING AFTER SHANE FOR THE NOVEMBER 2006 DATE WHO IS 100 TIMES BETTER THAN MARGARITO COULD EVER BE...

    HE NEVER DUCKED PAUL?? WHEN??? SOURCE??

    WHEN DID HE DUCK COTTO?? SOURCE???

    SEE WHAT I MEAN..U SHOW NO SOURCES...U JUST COME ON HERE TO TALK ****..U CAN'T BE TAKEN SERIOUS EITHER ...UR STUPID ASS IGNORES SOURCES AND FACTS SO U REALLY DONT POST **** THAT PROVES ANY TYPE OF PAINTS..

    TRANSLATES INTO YOU ARE A HATER....IF U DONT WANNA LIKE FLOYD THAN DON'T BUT AT LEAST KNOW WHY YOU DONT LIKE HIM AND THE FACTS BEHIND WHY YOU DON'T ...U JUST HATE HIM TO HATE HIM...:hi:

    O:thumbsup:hi:
     
  8. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    5,805
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    wtf are you on? This is boxing and i"m talking to a floyd fan. Floyd fan should be the last persons on earth to ask for sources regarding truths of statements. You can become a chicken or a roider just by speculation lol. No sources.

    And i don't have to research for you how many times paul called out floyd. Its all over the internet. Floyd didn't wanna take the boxing test with him lol. I could give you many statements from floyd saying he'd not fight cotto cause cotto is not a big draw, then subsequently contradicting himself saying pac and cotto made 1 mil cause cotto is a big name. I can do that but i won't, floyd fans don't deserve to get sources and evidence.

    Btw, floyd is getting props for thinking about fighting inactive grandpop mosley, lol, what a ****en chicken
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Epic shame for Hatton he didn't do better in this fight. There were people who had said all along that he wasn't very good. TITANIC loss. The reality is he was worse than anyone could have imagined against Pacquiao. Better he stays retired, IMV. His style is only effective with good reflexes and true footspeed. He's short on both at this point. It's sort of horrifying realizing what Hatton threw himself headfirst into, now that we saw what Pacquiao did to Cotto. Manny's power is crazy these days.
     
  10. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    Damn, fitzgeraldz was spot on like PacDbest! If Floyd-Pac ever happens which I think it eventually will, fitzgeraldz would be right on all his predictions on this thread.
     
  11. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    again..nothing factual...also...i am a fan of boxing before i am a fan of floyd...i started watching floyd in 1996....i started watching boxing around 89...dont get it twisted..im not one of these "floydettes" as u call them on here..ill tell it how i truly think it is and i wont side with one fighters argument cuz i like him more..if it were pacquiao demanding the tests i would still say floyd should man up and take them...

    U on the other hand are a "hater" as i think there refered to on esb...if the 2 sides flipped tomorrow and pac wanted testing and floyd didn't....u would side with manny saying that better testing etc..is good for the sport and floyd should just take the tests...thats why ur a bad poster n i post decent posts with good facts to back them up instead of just stating little opinions with nothing to back your opinions up...:d
     
  12. Cocteau

    Cocteau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,506
    0
    May 1, 2009
    wow these thousands of comments that in other words all say: "Pac is doing a very risky move for not staying at 135 division where his size belongs" - is not too long ago.
     
  13. el mosquito

    el mosquito Boxing Addict banned

    5,805
    0
    Nov 20, 2009
    wrong, if pacquiao was at the top of his game and has still a lot to prove then he suddenly retires, i'd be the first one to call him a chicken lol. you gotta admit, floyd did a classic chicken-job back then.

    And i made threads in my previous esb account about how i am displeased with pac being a primadonna with his negotiations with hatton. I believed back then that hatton was even generous enough to give pac a 50-50 and for pac to ask for more is just insane.

    You on the other hand calls pac a juicer without anything to back it up. I don't hear you saying floyd is a xylocaine addict lol. Now you are asking me to give facts and sources? You hypocritic *****. More than half of ESB agrees floyd is a chicken lol and i don't need sources to prove it lol.
     
  14. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    that sentence I put in bold is off base. He was the same fighter. He was ranked #8 against Floyd and #10 against Pac, even though he had lost to Floyd he was still ranked #10 p4p. The difference is that Pac didn't make Hatton move up in weight. If Hatton was fighting against other WWs I doubt he would have made the top10 p4p list at all.

    Hatton was definately a better fighter at 140 than at 147, even after his loss to Floyd. Malignaggi, Urango, and Collazo are pretty much on the same level, and Hatton destroyed Malignaggi and Urango at 140 but Collazo took him to hell at 147. Don't come in here with that talk of "Floyd ruined Hatton". Hatton has always had the same dumbass style and been vulnerable to getting caught coming in.
     
  15. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Even the Floyd fans used to say that Pac vs Floyd should be at a catchweight now they hate on Pac for fighting Cotto at a catchweight and say he should fight Floyd at 147.