If maths teacher and ***** Tits Breazeale are used as names to bolster Joshua's record, then it's only fair that they are mentioned. In reality, they are not even top 40 heavyweights but good enough for two consecutive titles defences of the IBF belt won off Charles Martin, who won it by default. The funny thing is Molina was only ever eligible for the Joshua machine because he went 9 rounds with Wilder. He and Breazeale are right up there as the worst boxers to ever get two title shots a piece.
Its a hard sell as noone really wanted it,and its more or less a foregone conclusion big fury will win
The difference is the better fighters apart from Molina and Breazeale Wilder and Aj have beaten. Big difference from Povetkin, Parker, Whyte, Parker, Ruiz and Pulev to Duhaupas, Ortiz, Spzilka and Stiverne.
Povetkin was old and was never as good as people like you make him out to have been - never a world champion. Paint Dry Parker is crap and that bout was a massive skidmark, I'd keep it on the hush if I were you. Whyte was out of shape, inexperienced and injured - still did a funny dance. Paint Dry Parker again? Rice Pudding Jr has never beaten anybody except Joshua, he's actually not very good and was just dropped by a formerly retired and shot to pieces Arreola who was never much good anyway. Pudding Pulev old and crap. I'm not sure how these "names" are supposed to strengthen your argument. A pudding is a pudding, it doesn't matter how it's parcelled up, what stations it's marketed on or how much it costs. It's a pudding. Your whole Joshua thing is coming crashing down and he has only one big win on his record and that was against Fury's sloppy seconds, in the last bout of his career (for good reason).
Povetkin had one the deeper resumes far better than Wilder. Proved that he was still dangerous despite his age against the likes of Hughie, Hunter and Whyte since. Funny that Ortiz age never gets mentioned? Despite his only notable win being 5 years ago and him being the only notable opponent Wilder has fought. Parker resume again stronger than Wilder with wins over the like Ruiz, Takam Hughie and Chisora since. Puplev again a has better career win than Wilder does with his win over Chisora. No shame in losing to Usyk who I've said since the Gassiev i favour him that he will go on to prove to be the best HW of the era.
A pudding is a pudding and your mantra is to say "Joshua's puddings are better than everyone else's puddings. They are "top 10" puddings." Also, Joshua lost to the pudding of all puddings in Rice Pudding Jr. The funny thing is Rice Pudding Jr couldn't even knock the skin off a rice pudding considering a rice pudding has a tougher skin than Liakhovich but he still managed to batter Joshua. It's all falling apart for you. It's damage control for you, at this point. You've put all of your hopes into Usyk beating Fury or Wilder.
If the likes Povetkin, Parker, Whyte, Ruiz, and Puoev are veiwed as "puddings" then surley Wilder is considering as they all either have better resumes or career wins?
Wilder has only lost one fight to the current best in the division - he is a danger to any fighter with that power and only needs 1 punch, 1 sec of the 2,160 secs available during the fight to do his damage.
Lost once fight that's because of very poor level of opposition he has fought. Spzilka one of his best wins and took rounds of Wilder whilst Chisors didn't even have break a sweat to knock him out in the first. Duhaupas is arguably Wilder's best win after Oriz and he was nothing more than the French Dave Allen and even he busted up Wilders face whilst Povetkin battered him. This is the guy who earned a title fight by fighting journeyman Jason Gavern who AJ fought less than year latter in his 11th Pro fight.
One punch, one second is all he needs and that is his simple fight tactic. Worked nearly every fight and Tony Dosh PPV would be retired should Wilder land one on him.