Is It Reasonable to Have JMM Ranked Ahead of Pacquiao P4P?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Faerun, Feb 2, 2012.


  1. Jak Boxer

    Jak Boxer Active Member Full Member

    900
    0
    Dec 3, 2012
    Pac ---------------> Marquez all time

    Pac in his prime, better fighter.

    Pac beat Marquez when they were in there primes

    Pac still competes better against most opposition 147 and down compared to Marquez

    Marquez had his number. Norton had Ali's. Was Norton better then Ali?
     
  2. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Pac has back to back losses. One of which he got KTFO.

    Pacfraud doesn't deserve to be on any P4P list let alone wondering about who he is ahead of or behind. Pac needs a win against a legit opponent.
     
  3. Dude, ****in Bradley beat Pacturd for gods sake. :lol:
     
  4. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    And Pacfraud made no attempt to rematch him to gain his honor back.

    "Yeah you took my belts... I would rather go get KTFO than get them back."

    :bart
     
  5. You goddamn right!! If that doesnt prove Pacturd's got a vagina, I dont know what will. WAR JMM!!!!!!
     
  6. Jak Boxer

    Jak Boxer Active Member Full Member

    900
    0
    Dec 3, 2012
    Bradley tried his best and still couldn't scrape up more then a few rounds against a faded Pac who was on 1st gear the whole night.

    No wonder they call you poop.
     
  7. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,210
    5,428
    May 22, 2011
    That's not the point, Pac is JMM's leftovers.:yep
     
  8. And its Bradley's fault that a PED-drained Pacturd couldnt get himself out of first gear? :lol:

    By the way, I call myself EdgarAllenPoop, you may call me Sir EdgarAllenPoop :hi:
     
  9. Zopilote

    Zopilote Dinamita Full Member

    19,247
    22
    Dec 12, 2009
    He beat him just like Bradley beat Pacquiao last year. ;)

    If he was a "better' fighter, he would have beaten him clearly at least once...news flash: he never did. :hi:

    JMM 4-0.

    3-0-1 at worst. :deal
     
  10. :yep
     
  11. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,623
    2,468
    Apr 22, 2012
    If you're going to use 'official' decisions like the pac-bradley fight then it is:

    Pac 2-1-1

    Can't have it both ways.

    Bradley didn't 'win' **** all.

    I have it:

    Marquez 2-1-1.

    It's hardly comparable to the Bradley fight anyway, that fight was not close. Only 1 blatant robbery out of the 4 and that was the 3rd fight, and the 10-7 score of the first round in their first fight is also a ****ing joke.
     
  12. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    Not like that. Bradley was an all out robbery, the 3 JMM fights were as close it gets.
     
  13. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009
    I think Pacquiao lying face down on the mat answers that question!
     
  14. Zopilote

    Zopilote Dinamita Full Member

    19,247
    22
    Dec 12, 2009

    You missed the point. I pretty much meant those "official decisions" are a bunch of bull****.
     
  15. Jak Boxer

    Jak Boxer Active Member Full Member

    900
    0
    Dec 3, 2012
    Pacquiao 2-1-1 . Deal with it :deal