is it still considered a robbery if a valid kd isnt scored?

if a fight is close, and a kd isnt scored, so the rounds are scored accurately considering the kd wasnt awarded, would you still consider it a robbery?

im talking like reid vs ottke.
mayorga vs spinks

and im sure there are others

so lets say you have a fight that is scored well by the judges on a round by round basis, but there should have been a kd. is it still a robbery?

 

i was gonna mention that but the fight wasnt close enough for me to make it relevant. it would be hard giving zab 6 of them rounds, so i left him out.

 

this is the point tho, without the kd, plus the deduction, the fight is close enough to go either way. because suddenly ottke has a 10-8 round, which aint the judges fault, it's the ref's. so is it still a robbery?

 

got one actually. jmm vs mab. mab should have had a kd and instead got a point deducted. without that mab would have won the fight, beating jmm. so is that fight a robbery?

 

is that also removing the points deduction?

 

well thats the point of the thread really.

had mab not been deducted, and been awarded the kd, i dont think jmm could have won the fight. so is it a robbery?