Is Jack Dempsey the most overrated fighter of all time

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jul 16, 2015.


  1. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,433
    Feb 10, 2013
    Yeah I totally didnt read any of your posts I commented on, quoted, and replied to either. LOL. My kid comes up with more original comebacks...
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,103
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: I can only imagine.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  3. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,433
    Feb 10, 2013
    Dont worry Im sure theres someone out there for you.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,103
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: you want to put off my comebacks on your kid and this is your line of patter?

    Good grief. Look, it's not personal and you should try to make it personal - it's only the impression you leave on the forum specifically in terms of your interactions over Dempsey. You think Dempsey's actions here were indefensible to the point where anyone who defends it is wildly biased towards Dempsey; I think they were (obviously) far from ideal but can be defended, and am a heavy critic of Dempsey. That is a very minor disagreement over a very minor event in boxing history.

    A page later you're wintering on about my fragile ego and my love life. It's a fixation as bizarre as dinovelvet's of Wladimir Klitschko and it make you hard to take seriously when you post about that fighter. That's all it is.
     
  5. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,433
    Feb 10, 2013
    My opinion of you is unchanged by anything you've said in your last post because I didn't read it. :lol:
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,649
    46,303
    Feb 11, 2005
    Consider this, it's 100 years later and he is the most often rated fighter... There is a magic to the guy.
     
    SwiftDot likes this.
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,103
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, Dempsey was great. He was a significant contender and then an undisputed champion who had one of the weakest reigns of any of his peers.

    It was Dempsey's being wildly overrated for so many years that has brought him absolutely crashing down on the internet. If he was properly appraised from the start he'd have been eeked out of many top tens around the time Larry Holmes arrived on the scene and be a well respected top 20 rated heavyweight all time about now. Instead his legacy is a weird battleground. Many who are violently opposed - and willing to spend years of their life producing proof - and others who continually stoke tales made famous in a simpler age.

    Unsurprisingly the truth is somewhere in the middle. I will say this though - heavyweight as an appraised division is vulnerable to these type of things. Because outside the top two, every heavyweight has some weird reason to lowball.

    Lewis and those knockout losses. Marciano's competition. Joe Frazier's devastating losses. On and on.

    You wouldn't see this Dempsey weirdness in any other division because the division actually lends itself to an argument for his more elevated rating.
     
    Cecil, roughdiamond, SwiftDot and 2 others like this.
  8. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,437
    9,422
    Jul 15, 2008
    He reads everything. He’s a last word freak. That aside what’s missing is that Dempsey had everything to lose. He was being built up as a man killer and the top contender for a title fight not yet locked in. Being made to look foolish by Jeannette was a dumb risk.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,561
    Apr 27, 2005
    Bingo.
     
    McGrain likes this.
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,103
    Mar 21, 2007
    I mean, I'm not sure he was a risk tbh.

    But I don't think Dempsey is compelled to meet someone he doesn't want to if he agreed to meet someone else. Whether that's because he thought he was a risk, hated him personally, didn't like the way he'd been calling him out, whatever. It's not something you have to do.

    On the other hand, there are loads of reasons to do it, and it's not a good look that he didn't.
     
  11. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,437
    9,422
    Jul 15, 2008
    Sure he was a risk. He was mentally prepared, had everything to gain and was always known as a supremely durable , tough fighter. Highly experienced. Dempsey had credibility to lose at a crucial time. It was a put on the spot stupid risk. Nothing to gain for Dempsey.
     
    The Morlocks and Jason Thomas like this.
  12. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,437
    9,422
    Jul 15, 2008
    Interesting and potent post .. let's keep in mind a few things ... Dempsey was a small cruiserweight .. he had a Holyfield like body but really primed out at a touch under 190 so despite a few signature wins over large men of sorts I agree he like many should be rated in a below 200 pound category .. Beating an old Willard, Firpo and Fulrton the way he did showed heavyweight power but matching him up against the best of the much bigger men is to me and has always been absurd but that is the heavyweight division ... where do you cut these match ups off ? At 200 ? Where does that leave 200 pound Louis or the 204 pound Frazier ? That said , it is what it is .. Dempsey and possibly to a greater degree Marciano are often projected to a level they don't belong based on a myriad of obvious facts .. In my opinion, both were terrific fighters but to match them up with other great fighters thirty to sixty pound heavier is absurd. We have weight classes for a reason .. maybe an answer is to rate heavyweight champs P4P opposed to H2H .. I personally felt Dempsey was a physically gifted fighter , speed, power, chin, toughness, heart, killer instinct, stamina .. just one that had a short and undeveloped peak because his marketability impacted his management's decisions on his continuing to graduate as a fighter .. he became a commodity, fights were surgically selected and while huge dollars were made his potential as a fighter was never reached ..
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2021
  13. louis54

    louis54 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,187
    1,302
    Mar 20, 2013
    Jess willard on the real goat ," I want to say that there isn't a man as far back as john l Sullivan who ever hit as hard as dempsey..... Besides being a wicked puncher he is a wonderful ring general , puzzling in his attack and defense, and remarkably clever. " 1919
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2021
    reznick and The Morlocks like this.
  14. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,944
    Nov 21, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  15. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,214
    19,511
    Jul 25, 2015
    This thread shows why I don't like Heavyweight.