Is Juan Manuel Marquez a great fighter

Of course.

IMO he just beat pac whos meant to be either 1 or 2 P4P, and hes a grandad in boxing terms.

I use Longetivity as a KPI as to how good a fighter is. It means they have raw skill even when there body starts slipping, and Marquez is a prime example.

 

Fixed it.

 

atsch

What a joke

 

There are at least 9 people on this forum who would be better off never watching a boxing match again.

 

I would like to point out to the *******s that voted no on here to think about this.

If Pac is so great why did he struggle so much 3 times and arguably lose all 3 to JMM with a fighter who is not an ATG??

Doesnt say much for him does it?

 

very few polls turned 2b as lopsided as this , i do share d majority's opinion this time .

 

because floyd is a cherrypicker and marquez is not .
p4p marquez >> floyd .
marquez is in my top 50 almost every time , floyd is outside of my top 100 almost every time . and unlike u or every 1 who will dare 2 criticize me , i actually have such a list so i know what i m commenting about .

 

of corse

 

To say he's not great then neither is Pac. Of course he's a great.

 

What a stupid poll; of course he is.

 

I did a poll of jmm being atg a year ago after that he beat katsidis and pac so he kind of sealed it imo.
Back then a majority voted yes, lets hope jmm can win a belt at 140.

 

Anyone who voted "no" should jump off a bridge or go have sex with one of Buboy's assistants.

 

YES.Marquez > Pacquuai in my estimation.

 

:huh Pac's accomplishments far outweigh JMM.

Not that JMM isn't great, but even if he was borderline ATG, or HOF , that wouldn't mean pacquiao isn't great. Was Ali not great because he lost to Ken Norton?