ATG just like P4P are opinions not facts. If you think he is, then he is. Others just may not agree with you.
I probably consider him an ATG, but I can see how you might have him at HOF level if you apply stricter criteria to ATG'ness. He is near the line between HOF and ATG I think.
im never serious. i agree, hes a good poster. i dont hold grudges, i just debate, if i disagree, i disagree.if i agree, ill say i agree.:good
Marquez has only lost to the very best of his era. He is a great fighter. He is so close to being an atg, but is he? I'd put him there as he would give anyone in and around his weight in history a fight. He also knocked out an atg unconscious for 4 minutes and everyone thought that that atg was dead. Scared the bejesus out of me.
Antonio Tarver tests positive http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/i...-tests-positive-banned-substance-june-2-fight
So are we talking about age or power pellets? You decide because if you want to go that route, I doubt that you really do. Again, WTF does Tarver and Marquez have in common with Marquez being ranked as an atg?
I have it in the following order: - great - fighters with great ability but not great resume e.g. golovkin - elite - bradley, ward - HOF - joe calzaghe - ATG - de la hoya, roy jones - legendary - sugar ray leonard, pacquaio - Ali - Muhammed Ali for exceptional contribution in raising the profile of the sport and exceptional contribution outside the ring.