Is Juan Manuel Marquez an ATG

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DON K, Sep 1, 2011.


  1. leone25

    leone25 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,605
    4
    Aug 13, 2010
  2. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
  3. Mike Tyson

    Mike Tyson IRON Full Member

    340
    0
    Jul 8, 2011
    great fighter but I don't think he'll be remembered as a legend
     
  4. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    Who knows how time will treat him but right now he's already considered a legend and one of the best of his generation.

    If Pac is remembered as a legend, the name JMM will be right there.

    Jmm will always be Norton to Pac's ALI!
     
  5. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
  6. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    No.Was he great?Unquestionably.Was he better than princess naseem hamed?Without a mother****ing doubt:yep.
     
  7. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,121
    10,532
    Jul 28, 2009
    He is a perfect example of why people need to understand that not everybody has the same definition of "all-time great". Because he's an excellent fighter with excellent achievements, but if your interpretation, for instance, is defining a number, like top 50, then I would never have him there. If it's top 100, then his position is rationally arguable, imo, but he wouldn't even necessarily be there. You might have a very loose idea of what you consider an all-time great. You might say, if you figure a fighter in the famous fantasy time machine could give a good fight to just about anybody, best for best, with the best of other generations, then he is an ATG. The point is, you guys may be arguing with different definitions in mind-which is pointless and I wish I'd grasped that much earlier, when I joined this forum, because it'd have saved me a lot of time. Time I could've spent satirizing the phenomenon of trolling.
     
  8. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    He should be! A belt at 140 would seal it even without beating Pac!
     
  9. ProfessorLex

    ProfessorLex Guest

    :rofl
     
  10. ProfessorLex

    ProfessorLex Guest

    Yeah right...

    JMM did not face Oscar...

    JMM did not face Cotto...

    JMM did not face Mosley...

    Imagine JMM facing Margarito? Will he counterpunch him? :lol:

    And OH he is taller than Pacquiao, he has longer arms, has wider shoulders..

    You still put him two levels below Pac?? NAH..i'd say at least three. :good
     
  11. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    yes- level below pac
     
  12. badr_hari

    badr_hari Member Full Member

    238
    1
    Jul 21, 2010
  13. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Marquez is the ****ing man.
     
  14. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    :rofl

    Is there a better way for a man to spend his leisure time?
     
  15. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    12
    Aug 26, 2009
    For those who say no. You guys have no respect for the sport

    JMM is one of the biggest assets in boxing. Heart, determination, superb technical skill and longevity has made him one of the best in our era. He arguably beat Pac twice aswell. And despite being 37 he is still the best lightweight in the world.

    ATG material