Is Juan Manuel Marquez the only elite fighter in his prime

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IsaL, Jan 20, 2009.


  1. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    Barrera was the king of the featherweight division when pacman beat him the 1st time so stop hating just cuz pac beat delahoya :lol::lol::lol:
     
  2. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    lol just like marquez did against pacquaio after the 1st fight. He was offered 750,000 for a rematch with pacman but instead flew to indonesia to lose to chris john for 30,000 :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  3. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    No the first fight was a draw...Marquez took more rounds in that fight than Pac too...:bbb...Barrera was prime in there first fight...Morales wasn't prime when he beat pac but pretty close to it...Hatton will be prime I guess!
     
  4. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    JMM was not even prime in the first fight, he was 40 yrs old. Sasakul was 40, Ledwaba was 41, MAB and Morales were 39 yrs when they first fought Pac, Solis was 38, Larios was 40, Lucero was 38, Diaz was 41 and ODLH was 45. Hatton is 41 now, WTF are you talking about?:patsch:patsch:patsch
     
  5. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    No... but JMM was 31. Ledwaba and Sasakul are nobodies, B level at best. Check their records. Solis, Lucero, Diaz - teh suckage. Everybody else was old.
     
  6. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Manny kissed it and must have been ****ing it too, because he STAYED down, unlike JMM>
     
  7. HyperBone

    HyperBone Silverback Gorilla Full Member

    7,152
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    what about ****ing rocky juarez who's also a b level at best... and past prime kevin kelley, past prime johnny tapia,and some guy named mzonke fana?

    criticize your fave fighter first before bashing pac as if he's just some worthless boxer who should have not been p4p1, a hypejob, and a poser...

    You're a ****** i'm sure now
     
  8. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    fana. i remember that guy. juarez. he fought twice. really. some of these haters are fun to toy with.

    they are like dinosaurs, large bodies, with very small brains. hahahaha.
     
  9. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    I hate the way Pac fans say "kiss" the canvas. It would have merit if he went down face first.

    To the thread: No, Barrera was in his prime.
     
  10. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    They know you do, that's why they say it over and over. They're children.
     
  11. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    barrera was 29, prime and p4p #3 in 2003 when pac beat him. sasakul was 26, the lineal champ and p4p #10 when pac beat him. now, if you also consider top 12-15 p4p as elite, then ledwaba who was 29 at that time can also be added here.

    just look at the current top 10 p4p list. absolutely nobody there is below 30 now. those who were like cotto, pavlik and margo are not anymore there.
     
  12. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006
    This content is protected
     
  13. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006

    since when did jmm became elite and who did he beat/dominated to be elite???...dont tell me casa or barrera since they are well past it...so who are the top fighters did jmm dominated then???
     
  14. HyperBone

    HyperBone Silverback Gorilla Full Member

    7,152
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    :rofl
     
  15. HyperBone

    HyperBone Silverback Gorilla Full Member

    7,152
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    no you are. just look at your own damn posts:-(