Is Ken Norton a Top 20 ATG Heavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ironchamp, Jan 21, 2011.


  1. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    Ken Norton is often branded as an elite fighter of the 70s which I think we can agree based on his talent level and big win over Muhammad Ali and 2 other closely contested fights the 3rd of which is likely a fight that could have (should have if you prefer) gone to him. I'm playing devil's advocate here but I've seen various top 15-20 lists that have him listed above fighters who, I'm beginning to feel probably out rank him legacy wise despite his signature victory.


    Best wins:

    Ali
    Young
    Quarry
    Stander
    Bobick
    Kirkman
    Cobb
    Clark

    For a top 20 ATG fighter his resume is rather light. Yes he Remained a top fighter in a talent laden division but he ranks below Ali, Foreman and Frazier coming in a distant 4th. He never actually won the title in the ring, rather he won it because his fight with Young became an eliminator after Spinks was stripped. He lost it in the very next fight against Larry Holmes.

    When you compare him to a list of other Heavyweights can a case be made that he can rank in the top 20? 15?

    Just as a refresher here are 20 Heavyweight Champions that should rank as Top 20, I excluded Norton on purpose and I'd like your views on who he should replace/ranked ahead of.

    21 ATG HWs (no order)

    Corbett
    Wlad
    Wills
    Langford
    Tyson
    Louis
    Ali
    Lewis
    Frazier
    Foreman
    Holmes
    Liston
    Holyfield
    Johnson
    Jeffires
    Dempsey
    Patterson
    Bowe
    Walcott
    Charles
    Marciano


    Thoughts?
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,228
    Feb 15, 2006
    Close but no cigar.
     
  3. prime

    prime BOX! Writing Champion Full Member

    2,564
    90
    Feb 27, 2006
    The story of Ken Norton.
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,109
    25,265
    Jan 3, 2007
    I placed him in the top 25.. He has a huge win over Ali, along with good scalps over Young, Quarry, Cobb, Kirkman, Bobick and a few others.. Most of his losses were primarily to great fighters, some of which when he was past it, and of all the men who ever fought in a heavyweight ring, he was one of the best conditioned. He comes close to top 20, but as some have already stated, doesn't quite make it there. His resume lacked either that crowning point, or consistancy that many of the others had. For example, he did manage to beat a better fighter in Muhammad Ali than anyone Wlad ever beat, but Klit has far more victories over ranked opposition, a better record and more longevity as a champ.. Still he is a great fighter... Perhaps he might have appeared on a top 15-20 list back around 1980 or so, but since the inductions, of Holmes, Tyson, Holyfield, Bowe, Lewis, and Klit, I think he got bumped off that list..
     
  5. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    I personally rank him in my Top 25.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,228
    Feb 15, 2006
    I guess it turns on quality of best wins vs versatility.

    Norton is strong on the former, but weak in terms of resume vs a wide variety of styles.
     
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,109
    25,265
    Jan 3, 2007
    Agreed,

    He did exceptionally well against the very best of technical boxers, but fell very short against the best of hitters.. Of course, there are few punchers who match up to the likes of Foreman, Shavers and Cooney, plus he fought two of those men when past his best, but we never saw how he'd do against otherwise, so it remanins a questionmark..
     
  8. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    40: Cleveland Williams
    39: Zora Foley
    38: Tommy Burns
    37: Michael Spinks
    36: James Douglas
    35: James Braddock
    34: George Godfrey
    33: Jimmy Bivins
    32: Max Baer
    31: Jerry Quarry
    30: Tim Witherspoon
    29: Bob Fitzsimmons
    28: Jack Sharkey
    27: Sam McVey
    26: Joe Jeanette
    25: Vitali Klitschko
    24: Peter Jackson
    23: Ken Norton
    22: Joe Walcott (Jersey)
    21: Gene Tunney
    20: Riddick Bowe
    19: Floyd Patterson
    18: Max Schmeling
    17: Ezzard Charles
    16: Sammy Langford
    15: Harry Wills
    14: James Corbett
    13: Sonny Liston
    12: Joe Frazier
    11: Mike Tyson
    10: Lennox Lewis
    9: James Jeffries
    8: Jack Dempsey
    7: Rocky Marciano
    6: Evander Holyfield
    5: Larry Holmes
    4: Jack Johnson
    3: George Foreman
    2: Joe Louis
    1: Muhammad Ali

    23 IMO.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    I think he has a solid case to be top20, he arguably beat most peoples number 1 2out of 3 times - well arguably 3 out of 3, past prime or not. Many of the top20 just didn't face Norton's level of competition
     
  10. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    Interesting List.

    Vitaly and Wlad should be ranked ahead or Norton. (you didn't include Wladimir in your rankings)
     
  11. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    No, I did it a few years back, and to be honest I still think Vladimir is struggling to get on there.

    Maybe time will make me more respectful of the brothers Klitschko, at the moment I resent them.
     
  12. prime

    prime BOX! Writing Champion Full Member

    2,564
    90
    Feb 27, 2006
    When Norton was the one with the punch in the match, he could be relentless against the best competition of all time.

    When facing superior power, he shrank, only too ready to lie down.

    I'm confident there have been 25 better overall heavyweights over 100 years.

    Boxing was a Plan B for college attendee Norton. He himself said he was never totally "serious" about boxing. It was never this or nothing.

    As Larry Holmes said, you can know a man by the way he fights. I respect Norton, but, in essence, to me he always seemed to be looking beyond the ring at something else, for something else.

    Physically, Norton was amazing. Mentally in the fire, not so much.
     
  13. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    As much as I hate to say it Wlad has alot more depth than Norton and has slowly via the Larry Holmes route beaten enough fighters to make it to the top 20 today if not the top 15.

    Wlad has grown on me on a head to head basis and Legacy wise.
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,413
    Jul 15, 2008
    He did give two of the top four all time heavyweights the toughest fights of their careers ... in addition he beat the absolutely best Jimmy Young ever ... however, against the monster hitters he froze up big time ... the question is how many were there that had the style to do that to Ken ?
     
  15. i also rank vitali over bowe