Is Ken Norton a Top 20 ATG Heavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ironchamp, Jan 21, 2011.


  1. top 20 absolutely yes. the only man who did beat ali always really.
     
  2. Curtis Lowe

    Curtis Lowe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,653
    1,171
    Feb 19, 2006
    That's a good post and a good point you make.
     
  3. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    Holmes and Berbick?;)
     
  4. are you joking?..... :patsch i am talking about a decent version of ali... not about an old fat man with parkinson
     
  5. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,037
    Sep 5, 2004
    1. Joe Louis
    2. Muhammad Ali
    3. Jack Johnson
    4. Larry Holmes
    5. Rocky Marciano
    6. Mike Tyson
    7. Lennox Lewis
    8. Evander Holyfield
    9. George Foreman
    10. Joe Frazier

    11. Jack Dempsey
    12. Sonny Liston
    13. Jim Jeffries
    14. Harry Wills
    15. Jersey Joe Walcott

    16. Ezzard Charles
    17. Sam Langford
    18. Wladimir Klitschko
    19. Floyd Patterson
    20. Riddick Bowe

    My revised list.

    I'm scratching my head trying to figure who Norton can replace.
     
  6. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    I never get how you can put Bowe in your Top10. Just like with Norton there are plenty of fighters who deserve to be ranked above him. At least more than 20, perhaps even more. He deserves to be ranked above Norton though, slightly.
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Or .... maybe Ali would be lower on everybody's list ?
    If Ali is judged to have lost 2/3 or even 3/3 to Norton, does he really still deserve to be ranked in the top 2 of all-time (as most people have him) ?
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    No, I don't rate Jeffries highly at all.
    You just like to say that to deflect from your own view that Tim Witherspoon is top 12, and David Haye rates above Dempsey.


    :lol:
     
  9. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    58
    Dec 26, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  10. i put norton above wladimir for sure. norton did beat ali 3 fights absolutely, he was past his prime and he gave the hell to prime holmes, norton was proved.
    (AND SORRY BUT TYSON IN THE TOP 10 IS SIMPLY RIDICULOUS).
    I THINK THAT NORTON WOULD BEAT PATTERSON,CHARLES AND WALCOTT
     
  11. frazier did beat ali once. The third fight was close, but still i think that ali won because eddie stoped the fight the first. ALI WON THE SECOND FIGHT CLEARLY.
    Norton did beat ali always and everybody know that.
     
  12. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    What, like 76 Ali, who fought Norton?

    Decent is a relative word...
     
  13. norton did beat ali in 1973 and he broke his jaw...
     
  14. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    And Ali won the rematch! But I like you would say Ali was decent in 73, so we are in agreement.

    I am putting it to you, Ali was not decent in November 1976, and as early as that date, was showing (with hindsight) the signs that we now know to be his Parkinson's syndrome (and possible Dementia Pugilistica).
     
  15. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,037
    Sep 5, 2004
    Although Wladimir is not the undisputed champion (which would count against him if he never unifies) he's dominating this era something Ken Norton has never done. Yes, he gave Ali 3 tough fights, but he only won 1 of them officially. He gave hell to prime Holmes but Holmes beat him. Norton's resume can't stand alone on 1 win vs Ali. It needs more depth. Wlad hasn't beaten many good fighters just a few decent contenders. But Norton's resume is very light, he simply doesn't have much to go by. Giving Ali and Holmes tough fights isn't enough to rank ahead of Wlad.

    Personally I think Wlad would give Ali a tough fight himself.

    I'm not 100% convinced that Norton beats Patterson who himself had a decent punch. But even if he can beat Patterson, Charles and Walcott it doesn't mean that he rates above them simply because he's the better fighter.

    Tyson is a top 10 Heavyweight. I base it on:

    1. Cleaning out the division.
    2. Consistent and dominant tenure as Champion
    3. Quality of opposition when he fought them.
    4. His resume has Depth.