Is kessler contractually obligated to the super 6?

excellent point, its the dumbest idea ive heard all day

 

Kesslers is obligated.
They all are ALREADY. And Kessler is the reason behind it all. Only way he can over come his loss to JC is by winning the S5 tourney. He has a mission.

The only person Jones should be
fighting is Hopkins. Hopkins is to chicken **** to do it. It would be HUGE so you cant play the $ racket. Hell they could even fight in Europe and pull 60K people. I would put money on Jones.

 

I think it would be terrible idea to drop out of the S6 and fight Jones. It would be a lose lose & possible another lose situation if he did. He'd be accused of ducking the best legitimate fighters in his division, fighting a shot fighter and if he lost could almost commit career suicide.

 

1. Kessler is contractually-obligated to fight in the Super 6

2. Roy Jones is contractually-obligated (or soon to be) to fight Danny Green in Australia.

3. How are you sure Roy can make 168?

4. Why the hell would Kessler pass up this opportunity to prove to the world he is the best at 168 by beating five of the best guys in the division? Fighting a faded RJJ doesn't prove ****.

5. Why the hell would Roy Jones want to fight Kessler? He is an unknown in America. Simple risk vs reward. You don't fight a guy that not many people know but is a real tough fight, especially when the payout probably isn't gonna be as high as say a fight vs Hopkins, Dawson, etc.. He'd have to get this fight in Denmark if he wants to make any real $.



I gotta agree with the above posters and say this is an incredibly stupid idea. On all levels. For all parties involved.

 

**** that noise. I don't want to see Roy get stopped that brutally.

 

So instead of watching Kessler fight legit contenders,you would rather see him beat on an old shot Roy......wtf is wrong with u?

 

Can't see any appeal in this idea at all.