Is Kovalev~Hopkins a win/win for boxing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JAB5239, Nov 3, 2014.


  1. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    :good
     
  2. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    80% leaning toward a win/win no matter who the victor is. Good to see the manority are unbiased. :good
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,407
    83,285
    Nov 30, 2006
    "It's good for boxing no matter who wins" - as long as it's a clean win.

    A chintzy DQ or technical decision, or Hopkins breaking his back and writhing on the ground with Kovalev awarded the victory by TKO without having used his fists to get it - that would suck.

    A clean win either way, for the very different reasons listed in the OP, is great for boxing.
     
  4. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    Criminal history? Really? :patsch

    Poor reasons IMO.
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    16,011
    Jul 19, 2004
    Just to play Devil's Advocate, there are scenarios I can envision where a win that isn't clean might actually be even more of a win for boxing if the controversy invites elevated interest (which is certainly possible, I think).
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,407
    83,285
    Nov 30, 2006
    I suppose we can harken back to Hopkins' rivalry with Chad Dawson.

    In hindsight, was that a boon for boxing, or a stain upon it? :think

    The prognosis certainly wasn't good after their first meeting, with that bizarre and unsatisfactory ending and the never-popular result of the dreaded No Contest. Plus, while it lasted, it just wasn't shaping up to be a very good fight. It left a bad taste in almost everyone's mouth.

    That drummed up mixed emotions when it came to a rematch. People wanted to see their business settled and determine who really was the best light heavyweight at the moment, but at the same time, once bitten twice shy - nobody thought it would be a particularly enjoyable viewing experience and there was the looming specter of it again somehow going awry due to what increasingly was perceived as Hopkins' senescent frailty.

    Instead, we got a halfway decent boxing match with a clear winner - and for a short time all was right with the world and there was a clear #1 light heavyweight in the world in Bad Chad. So I guess it turned out alright? :conf It was hardly a barnburner, though - and paired with Hopkins vs. Dawson I it will be remembered as 24 rounds of some of the ugliest, dirtiest boxing in light heavyweight championship history.
     
  7. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    16,011
    Jul 19, 2004
    Well, that might be a better example of a win that wasn't clean doing more harm than good. But the first Pascal fight, for instance, was a draw that most felt Bernard won despite getting twice dropped in the early going. The draw drew a little controversy in that regard, and I think that rivalry did do a good bit to boost boxing's popularity, at least across two North American nations..

    I think, generally speaking, what you say typically rings true. But having an odd ending can do some good, and I think a textbook example of that would be the first Golota-Bowe fight, with it's bizarre unsatisfying ending followed by the unfortunate riot - I think Bowe-Golota boosted boxing in a good way. If nothing else it was the catalyst for me becoming a die hard fan of the sport. :D
     
  8. Mr "T"

    Mr "T" Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,278
    33
    Mar 17, 2007
    Looks like you've made your mind up
    Hop is an ex-convict? That seems to be a fact
    and you think it's funny
     
  9. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,271
    5,888
    Oct 5, 2009
    Great for boxing hard to predict

    Here's to belt holders who were on different networks with different promoters

    Every trend today shows these 2 guys would never meet and they did in an era where the best find every way out they found a way in

    I feel either fighter winning is good for the sport

    Last hurrah for a legend or the start of a new star
     
  10. box4life11

    box4life11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,614
    18
    Apr 5, 2009
    Hopkins only wins by faking a injury
     
  11. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    What does that have to do.with boxing?
     
  12. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    A vote for "only if Hopkins wins"? Thats as ridiculous as voting only if kov wins. Theres really only one right answer to choose from, and neither of those are it if you're not just a fanboy. :patsch
     
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,407
    83,285
    Nov 30, 2006
    Uh, why's the poll open until 8/31/16? :huh
     
  14. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    Lol, i just hit some numbers! :nut
     
  15. kovalevtheGoat

    kovalevtheGoat The Chelyabinsk Machine banned Full Member

    5,600
    78
    Jul 28, 2014
    A win win for Sergey KRUSHER Kovalev the greatest lhw of all times. And second p4p puncher behind Julian The Hawk Jackson.