is Lara Vs Smith for Floyds proper WBA title

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by The General, Nov 11, 2014.


  1. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    he hasn't defended it in 14 months and has no fight lined up for anytime soon, is the lara vs smih fight actually for the proper WBA title or are they going to let Floyd keep the belt for about 2 years without defending it:lol:

    in fairness before the Canelo fight he went 18 months without defending the title, its getting ridiculous
     
  2. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    Isnt floyd the super champ since he unified with the WBC Belt. i think lara-SMith is for the regular title
     
  3. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    so? the fact is he should be forced to face mandatories or vacate

    2 defenses in 3 years is ridiculous and he hasn't had to face one mandatory in almost 3 years
     
  4. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    Canelo was his mandatory.

    yes 2 defenses in 3 years is ridiclous but thats how it is when you the man. I think Ward still has a title and i cant remeber last time he fought.

    shady business my friend
     
  5. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    canelo could't have been his mandatory he already had the WBA title thus making him ineligable to be a mandatory for another belt

    its bull**** if every boxer was aloud do this than we would only have 45 title fights in the whole of boxing every year