Is Lennox Lewis' legacy overrated?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Polish-Delight, Dec 29, 2011.


  1. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    :nut Even by your high standards that is exceptional. :dead
     
  2. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    He got starched by Rahman.
    But he returned the favor in emphatic fashion.

    He did duck Byrd actually for a million dollars and Range Rover.

    Losing most of his belts had more to do with pursuing big money fights than really ducking opponents but I don't think it should hurt him or help him.

    Vitaly put up a good fight but was ultimately stopped despite his gallant effort and emphatic pleas to continue. Lewis won fair in square and as he realized that his body wasn't the same and called it a day, as champion. That is leaving on a high note.

    Don't twist it or change the situation to take away what was essentially a good win for Lewis by turning this into a Vitaly thread. It's not fair to either fighter.
     
  3. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008

    I think the Rahman series adds to his legacy. Lewis showed a ton of heart travelling into Rahman's hometown and absolutely sparking him out after being KO'd in the first match. That showed he had the heart and mental makeup of a true fighter.

    Wlad had big brother take care of Sanders after he got KO'd. A great illustration between the two.
     
  4. Bubby

    Bubby Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,564
    3
    Sep 14, 2010
    Sanders refused a rematch with Wladimir..
     
  5. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    195
    Oct 11, 2010
    Nice try but this is exactly my point: Lewis valued money over legacy in his later years. Why shouldn't it be held against him.
     
  6. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    Because these guys do not do it for fun . . . its how they make a living:patsch. So many tend to forget that this a business or how fighters make a living first . . . then a sport. Very few fighters do this **** for fun and those are the ones who leave the sport penniless
     
  7. Bubby

    Bubby Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,564
    3
    Sep 14, 2010
    And Lewis valued his ass more than money, thats why he ran from Vitali.:lol:
     
  8. praetorianJJ

    praetorianJJ Conqueror of Worlds Full Member

    5,074
    2
    Apr 24, 2011
    Ok. Just don't let it happen again:bart
     
  9. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Lewis was a hell of a champ. Not perfect, but a damn good HW. Came back from adversity, beat Holyfield twice. Yes, he got a TKO by cornrows against Vitali, but he probably would have beaten him anyway. It's a rough sport, boxing. The Tyson "fight" was a joke, but so what, Lewis dominated. It is what it is. Haters gonna hate. And he'd have left Wlad starched on the canvas.
     
  10. crippet

    crippet Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,377
    20
    Dec 1, 2007
    Why should he rematch someone he beat so easily??

    Rachman Ko'd a prime Sanders and a 37year old Sanders destroyed Vladimir

    Vitali was lucky he was fighting an ancient 38 year old Sanders or he would probably have been stopped

    And neither of them did as well against Sanders as Rachman did against a younger Sanders..............But Vitaly kept cancelling his fights against Rachman and left the sport rather than face him, waiting till Rachman was 36 and was fighting his brother.
    Nice tag team!

    Its interesting to note that Vitali is fighting Chisora next, who wouldnt have been able to beat Gary Mason who Lewis beat at domestic Level on the way up - I mean, how embarrassing Vitali fights a 15-2 fighter as a title defence, where Lewis was fighting Masons 35-0 at domestic level