is lennox lewis overrated?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by badassQatari, Oct 2, 2011.


  1. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    ...Too easy.
     
  2. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,273
    5,894
    Oct 5, 2009
    Hes one of the best of recent times if not all times

    he beat pretty much everyone in his era and from the era before him
     
  3. Nosbor

    Nosbor Boxing Addict banned

    5,346
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    I have him at 9 or 10 on my ATG list. Too bad he was/is such a pseudo intellectual(sp) *****.
     
  4. Guybino

    Guybino Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,584
    1,691
    Mar 6, 2011
    badassqatari, its ok if you dont like Lennox.

    But he was one of the greatest heavyweights of all time.

    so no, hes not overrated.
     
  5. praetorianJJ

    praetorianJJ Conqueror of Worlds Full Member

    5,074
    2
    Apr 24, 2011
    He's one of only two guys of his era who fought every guy out there. Btw, I know he didn't fight comebacking Foreman but how big a threat was he? And the other guy who fought everyone is Holyfield. The difference is that Lewis beat everybody that was a marginally known name at the time. He earned the name Emperor in my book.
     
  6. badassQatari

    badassQatari Active Member Full Member

    858
    0
    Mar 13, 2011
    tyson was done after prison. fact
    holy was hardly a shadow of his prime self when he got to him. fact
    to be called great, you must beat great fighters in their greatest forms in great fights. thats why duran to leonard 1 was a lot better win than leonard to duran 3. though i must agree lennox has the tools to become great.

    every great fighters have a host of bums... errr... 2nd tier fighters in their resume. this argument hardly mean anything
    90s is one of the weakest era. Hall of fame locks in this era were all on the slide of their performances

    the biggest case against lewis were his losses against mccall and rahman.no greats would lose in their prime against guys like them. ali, louis, dempsey, sure theyve all suffered defeats, but not during their primes, and certainly not against mccalls and rahmans of their time
     
  7. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    94
    Oct 29, 2010

    Really!
    I think you'll find a lot of people think it's the second best era. Definitely talent wise.
     
  8. badassQatari

    badassQatari Active Member Full Member

    858
    0
    Mar 13, 2011
    go ahead
    :rasta
     
  9. badassQatari

    badassQatari Active Member Full Member

    858
    0
    Mar 13, 2011
    :huh
    talent wise?

    theres only lewis in this era. and holy who primed in 89-92, who was actually a bloated cruiser.
     
  10. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    94
    Oct 29, 2010
    I wonder if i never had Lewis as my avatar, would badassqatari still ignore me?:think
     
  11. badassQatari

    badassQatari Active Member Full Member

    858
    0
    Mar 13, 2011
    so beating nobodys equals greatness?
     
  12. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009
    The guy is cool as hell.
     
  13. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    94
    Oct 29, 2010

    Is that your true colors starting to show b?
     
  14. badassQatari

    badassQatari Active Member Full Member

    858
    0
    Mar 13, 2011
    :yep
     
  15. badassQatari

    badassQatari Active Member Full Member

    858
    0
    Mar 13, 2011
    as i stated in my reply to cachi, every greats have a host of 2nd tier guys in their resume. so that argument hardly mean anything. look at louis resume, his bums of the month was even used as case against him