Is Lewis also the HW of the 2000's? Discuss.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MVC, Dec 30, 2012.


  1. MVC

    MVC Boxing Junkie banned

    12,389
    7
    Mar 5, 2012
    Is Lewis also the hw of the 2000's as well as the 1990's? Discuss.

    Beat Evander 2nd time (End of 1999) but I count it as an early 2000 fight ofc :bbb

    Beat Michael Grant :bbb

    David Tua :bbb

    Lost to Rahman but avenged it right after :bbb

    Beat Mike Tyson :bbb

    Beat the next hw star in Vitali Klitschko :bbb

    With this streak of top fighters, can he also be considered the HW of the 2000's?
     
  2. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    I don't think he is for the 2000s. He retired sort of early.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,242
    Sep 15, 2009
    Noone did better than him in the decade.

    I think its easier to argue him hw of the 00's than hw of the 90's as holy is right up there with him.
     
  4. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    good point. It is really between Lennox and Evander in 1990s and Lennox and Klits in 2000s. Hagler,Hearns and Leonard all won title near the beginning of the 1980s so we can pretty much rate them in one decade, but Lennox was a mid decade to next mid decade fighter. Harder to put him in one specific decade. I do think he rates over Evander in the 1990s. Then we have to consider Bowe, who didn't last long but was legit for a few years. That would have solidified Lennox in the 1990s's. a win over Bowe.
     
  5. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    Get Lenny's nuts out of your mouth. It's too crowded in there already with Haymon's.
     
  6. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    stfu troll

    1999 is 1999 evander doesnt count
    he beat a shot to **** tyson
    was knocked out by rahman
    beat tua and grant, rahman,vitali

    being 5-1 does not make one fighter of the decade stupid
     
  7. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,757
    29,703
    Jan 18, 2010
    :blood
    Big Lennox fan, but please...
     
  8. 12downfor10

    12downfor10 Guest

    The ring magazine thought so. Whatever their writers opinions is worth.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,242
    Sep 15, 2009

    Yeah definitely. I think from the first holy fight to the Golota fight, bowe was the best HW in the world.

    Holy had a great start of the decade and a very strong finish fighting nearly even with Lewis in the rematch.

    Lewis spent nearly the whole decade as the choice for "next best heavyweight" so he's a tough one to rank for me in that decade.

    In the thousands he began as champ and regained the title in arguably a career best performance over Rahman. His win over Vitali is a huge boost for his legacy in the decade. Vitali can't really compete because he retired soon after hitting the pinnacle. Wlad is obvious choice to be up there but he lost twice by ko avenging one defeat. However I don't think he beat anyone in the decade who can compare with Lewis 's top few victories. It's close but but not as close as the previous decade for me.
     
  10. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    and I think Lennox was about to stop Vitali with a right hand when they fought. People always said they stopping that fight took if from Vitali, but Lennox was starting to get in range with that right and landing it a little I think he would stopped Vitali in the next few rounds. I could see it, and Lennox was coming on.
     
  11. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,567
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    Couldve been had he fought on into say, 06/07.

    And his last fight, at age 37, he said he was he'd felt physically stronger than he'd ever before.

    Couldve fought on without rematching Vitali. He'd KO Jones Jr, KO Ruiz, beat Byrd, and beat Valuev.

    He didn't need those names to add to his already ATG resume, but wins over those guys woulda cemented him at the best of the 00s as well.:deal
     
  12. Richel Hersisia

    Richel Hersisia Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,544
    2
    Jan 31, 2005
    Wlad is the clear nr 1 of the 00's
     
  13. Clarkson

    Clarkson Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,703
    0
    May 7, 2009
    Wlad is the number 1 of the 00's.

    [url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=322999&page=1[/url]
     
  14. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    197
    Oct 11, 2010
    Wlad is #1 and it is not even close. Wlad beat much better opposition than Lewis in '00s.
    Byrd held wins over Tua and Holyfield at the time. McCline destroyed Grant in 1. Lewis was milking his belts in 00s while Wlad was fighting the top contenders.
     
  15. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,448
    1,029
    Mar 6, 2011
    His prime years were in the 2000's so it's possible.