Wins over Crolla Campbell Pedraza Russell jr and Rigondeaux. Is this enough or does he need to beat more quality fighters in the next 2-3 years to be considered an atg ?
Ams and pro, Loma has ATG skills and achievements, I would say, yes, for me. 2 Olympic golds, 2 World Championship golds iirc, 3 weight world champion as a pro. I think he maybe could have unified more at 130lbs before moving to 135. He might need to do a little more to definitively answer this, but I think he can probably beat Lopez in a rematch.
LoL, why for hell Loma might had needed any one next fight vs Salido? Why? Salido did not had make weight and lost belt on scales cos did not had used time offered by WBO to make second attempt to weight in in limit and instead of this started to rehydrate. And if you will talk about stuff how great boxer is Salido and how better than Loma he is, imagine numbers of rounds he might had lasted vs Campbell, Linares or Lopez? LOL. Really we should talk that boxers like Patterson were not great because Johansson KOed him out cold, doesn't matters that he had won rematches vs him? Damn, did Salido had finished Loma in distance? LOL. We quickly might exclude from ATG lists Ali, Foreman and Frazier etc boxers here, damn, and these even had been finished in distance! Yeah, there is big difference, they are not from Ukraine. So A. Salido does not have belt anymore. B. Loma does not have belt and gets fight for belt vs 24-0-0 pro boxer and had won this the same belt. C. Why in the hell he needs fight with Salido anymore? D. Let's teach Salido make weight and not cry about his lost belt on the scales. They even gave him time to make weight in limit with second attempt, he started to gain weight not attempt to cut weight. Sure, kid, full internet from western sources is about this story. Including how much weight they had in the ring. LOL, bunches with US boxers were bad cos they does not have 0 in fight record at pros. Why wtf you need boxing? For 0 in fight record? Let it be, there for you remains few candidates to be good boxers. Starting with Ottke, yeah, he is better than Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Holmes, Patterson, Hoylfied, Lewis, DLH, etc and etc boxers. Why? 0 in fight record is all your value, then you should rate Ottke above Ali, Tyson, Foreman, Frazier, Lewis, DLH etc etc boxers. Are you still in agreement that Ottke is with better resume than these because he does have 0 in pro record? I just had used the same criteria for your idols like you had used for Loma. You can't used double criteria for boxers when you judge their resumes.
You normally are not normal. A lot of notable boxers did not had fight with boxers who had defeated them. Is this proof about boxer's value. I will tell in reality that you never had boxed nor in ams nor in pros and judge boxers from their ORIGIN and 0 in fight record. So be proud about Salido gratness, I'm not scared, you are dumb poster in internet nothing more. Casual posters like you are xxx xxx in internet. Congratulate yourself that you are an idiotic troll here.
Ohh, ohh. So for you pro boxing is 0 lost fights in pro record must have. Of course ppl like you are majority in internet forums. Also you need doctor if you think that lost fight on cards might take anyone's soul or ashame him. Nope, shame is for ppl like you there. Cos dudes like you we see less and less close matchups in pro boxing scene. Fans like you are ruining boxing because you are customer for this business and demand HOLY 0 in pro record. Go with this. You never will change your opinions, you will troll in internet the same after 10 years too. I'm sure and better I will not waste time with you anymore.