Is Lomachenko an all-time great ?

Absolutely ATG as H2H ability.
His resume is also very good but he hasn't an ATG in his resume.

 

I'm no fan of Teo, but it's obvious Teo had his eyes set on Loma and practiced how to fight him for years. Loma was his target for years. Although they didn't want the rematch, Jr and Sr wanted that fight for ages. Stop pushing that garbage narrative, as Loma was all they ever talked about.

So you think Loma's domination of opponents is more impressive than what Mike Tysons was doing? Or Ali when he 1st came on the scene?

What about RJJ? RJJ's destruction of Tony eclipses any win of Loma's by a mile.

The level of Campbell and Linares is nothing, they are belt holders not elite champions. Thurman is better than either of those two and Pac beat him at 40, even though he was coming back from injury he is still better than them.

SRL has wins over Hearns and Duran. Hearns had a huge size advantage, more skilled than Linares and Campbell, p4p one of the hardest punchers in history, faster, with insane reach. He got wins all the way up to LHW. Campbell won't even step foot one division upwards even though he has the size to do it.

Both of which would lay out Campbell and Linares in the 1st round even they were the same size. Stop making outrageous claims. Ignorant claims like this is what turned so many off of Loma on forums, even though he is such a high quality fighter.

 

Sure. But what he does from this point on determines where his legacy stands. Lets wait and see.