Is Malik Scotts Academy Award for "Best Bum in a Dive" in danger?

Scott was in a legit fight and was supposed to be a real contender. Rourkes fight was an exhibition

 

No scott is till ahead and deserves to keep the award

 

Seymour was a 1-9 cabbie, who probably made 10X more in that single fight, than he had in his previous 10 combined.

So at trashman's rate of $350/fight take home. X 10 pro fights = $3500 in his trash collecting career. If he didnt make 35K in that fight, I'll eat my hat. :yep:yep:yep

 

The general public lapping up this BS. "Wasn't Rourke's opponent some sort of amateur champion?"

As if this guy was an 'opponent'.

 

Scott still deserves his award given the circumstances, importance of the match and all

One match was just an exhibition from a 62yo actor that nobody was taking seriously

the other fight was supposedly the first ¨step-up¨ match from Murica's last prospect for the HW title, remember, a lot of money has been invested in Windmiller and many gullible casuals even believe the hype is real

very different situations

 

Exhibition or not, it was Scott who took the more obvious dive.

 

Both were obvious dives.... But Scott was far worse as it was a meaningful fight(Title eliminator) and Rourke's fight was a sideshow attraction to begin with....

 

better than WWE!

 

No Hany Atiyo? I mean yeah maybe not as bad of a dive but at least for consideration...

 

Scott was a bit more subtle in his ways, I found his acting more believable. I think he's the winner for this academy award.

 

i voted for the bum that fought that bum Rourke cause they should have more class than wilder & scott.