Is Manny Pacquiao the best fighter without a major belt?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ko factor, Jul 20, 2007.


Page 1 of 2
  1. ko factor

    ko factor Active Member Full Member

    852
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
    I would say yes.Thoughts?
     
    ko factor, Jul 20, 2007
    ko factor, Jul 20, 2007
    #1
  2. *BOX_FAN*

    *BOX_FAN* Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,540
    0
    Jul 5, 2007
    Today yes but meaby tomorrrow already no :hey
     
    *BOX_FAN*, Jul 20, 2007
    *BOX_FAN*, Jul 20, 2007
    #2
  3. LogDog69

    LogDog69 Active Member Full Member

    1,245
    1
    Jul 18, 2007
    Definitely Pacquiao. Also Hatton, Hopkins, and Wright should be mentioned.:good
     
    LogDog69, Jul 20, 2007
    LogDog69, Jul 20, 2007
    #3
  4. ko factor

    ko factor Active Member Full Member

    852
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
    I think Hatton has an alphabet belt...I'm not sure about Hopkins & Wright.
     
    ko factor, Jul 20, 2007
    ko factor, Jul 20, 2007
    #4
  5. LogDog69

    LogDog69 Active Member Full Member

    1,245
    1
    Jul 18, 2007
    Hatton vacated and fought Castillo. Malagnaggi, or however you spell it, has his IBF belt now.
     
    LogDog69, Jul 20, 2007
    LogDog69, Jul 20, 2007
    #5
  6. ko factor

    ko factor Active Member Full Member

    852
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
    Oh ok thanks for the info:good But I believe as of now Pacquiao is the best fighter without an alphabet title followed by whoever wins between Wright & Hopkins then followed by Hatton. :yep
     
    ko factor, Jul 20, 2007
    ko factor, Jul 20, 2007
    #6
  7. Shpion

    Shpion IDF Full Member

    2,678
    1
    Feb 9, 2007
    Of course. I think he is the only fighter today where when he fights somebody a belt has no sagnificance whatsoever.
     
    Shpion, Jul 20, 2007
    Shpion, Jul 20, 2007
    #7
  8. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    He may be. Depends on if you think he is better than Winky Wright. If Wright beats Hopkins....nope.
     
    kg0208, Jul 20, 2007
    kg0208, Jul 20, 2007
    #8
  9. WestSideBoxer

    WestSideBoxer Member Full Member

    498
    0
    Jun 9, 2007
    Yes :bbb
     
    WestSideBoxer, Jul 20, 2007
    WestSideBoxer, Jul 20, 2007
    #9
  10. nighthunter

    nighthunter Active Member Full Member

    728
    0
    Apr 3, 2007
    :good

    I definitely Aggree:bbb :happy :happy :happy
     
    nighthunter, Jul 20, 2007
    nighthunter, Jul 20, 2007
    #10
  11. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    Both Pac and Hatton are holders of the ILLUSTRIOUS WBC International title!!!!!:lol:


    It's just another way for the orgs to play bull**** games!!!!


    Both are true Champions and the belts they hold their pants up with are just as meaningful, IMO:yep
     
    C Money, Jul 20, 2007
    C Money, Jul 20, 2007
    #11
  12. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Bhops and Hatton have belts IMO. :yep
     
    psychopath, Jul 20, 2007
    psychopath, Jul 20, 2007
    #12
  13. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    I concur....I dont think its even close...I hope he never pays a sanctioning fee...he could possibly single-handedly end this alphabet mess
     
    Illmatic, Jul 20, 2007
    Illmatic, Jul 20, 2007
    #13
  14. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    yep. he probably is.
     
    Chert, Jul 20, 2007
    Chert, Jul 20, 2007
    #14
  15. theHawtness

    theHawtness Active Member Full Member

    1,321
    0
    Apr 2, 2007
    pac. not for long..
     
    theHawtness, Jul 20, 2007
    theHawtness, Jul 20, 2007
    #15
Page 1 of 2